Why the Nokia N97 sucks... and why it still rules

Published by Steve Litchfield at 12:38 UTC, April 29th 2010

Summary:

If there's such a thing as a popular whipping bag in the mobile world, the Nokia N97 surely has to be it. The original S60 5th Edition flagship has undergone so many troubles and humiliations in the last 12 months that it should surely be six feet under by now. And yet, despite having ready access to any phone in the world, my main SIM card is currently in... the Nokia N97. Here's why it sucks... and why it still rules. In an understated, misunderstood, jack of all trades way....

Whoa there!

Stop. I know exactly what you're going to say - so I'll get in first.

The Nokia N97:

  • is a great example of Nokia "plastic-fantastic" (as Andy Lee would say). Squeeze the plastic back and it creaks a little. Be careless with the plastic touch screen and you've got a nice matte of scratches.
     
  • Camera glass design problemhad a couple of poorly designed components for the first few months of its life. Specifically, the camera glass protector (which sat too low and scratched the thing it was supposed to protect) and a badly shielded GPS antenna. Both components are fixable at service centres and have been fixed for all production hardware since about October 2009.
     
  • is underpowered in terms of CPU, RAM and internal (system disk, C:) flash memory. Hit it hard with running apps and something will break. Things will grind away slowly, apps will get closed in the background and if you get download-happy with Nokia-optional 'upgrade' components, you'll run out of room on C: and you'll be facing a backup/re-format/restore cycle to try and recover the situation. This facet of the N97 alone is worth you not recommending it to anyone who's afraid to get their hands dirty with 'tech'.
     
  • has a touch interface that's clearly still first (or maybe second, to be generous) generation. When S60 5th Edition first became available (in the 5800), it was klunky, now it's a lot less klunky and merely a bit inconsistent and a little confusing. And no, the N97 won't get Symbian^3 - I refer you to the bullet point above.
     
  • has a qwerty keyboard that's minimalist at best, with an offset space bar (that you do get used to in seconds, to be fair) and which requires a 'shift' to even get a comma.
     
  • has stereo speakers that are just about the tinniest I've heard - and they're not the loudest either.
     

Enough evidence to put the N97 away 'where the sun doesn't shine'? Probably. In which case why on earth do I keep coming back to the N97 over and over again? And it's not just me - go ask bloggers like Micky Aldridge, who seems caught in the same loop as me.

We talked a year or so ago on All About Symbian about the Nokia E75 being a great all-rounder, a device which excels at absolutely nothing but which does absolutely everything to a competent degree. This is also how I feel about the N97. There is absolutely nothing it does which is better than every other phone in the world. But there's also (almost) nothing it can't do.

Just to re-iterate, I've had the following brand new top-end smartphones pass through my hands just in the last four months:

  • Nokia E72 (tiny 2.4" screen, no Podcast client) - see the AAS review
  • Samsung i8910 HD (super hardware but let down by lack of official support, poor battery life - see below - and illegible screen in the sun - ditto) - see the AAS review
  • HTC Desire (poorish speaker, poorish battery life, and again illegible in the sun) - see the Phones Show review
  • Google Nexus One (as above, but with less HTC-ised software package) - see the Phones Show review
  • Sony Ericsson X10 (terrific screen, poor battery life, appalling mono speaker) - see the Phones Show review
  • Sony Ericsson Satio (buggy, poor Xenon-integration, cheap plastics. And did I mention it was buggy?) - see the AAS review
  • Sony Ericsson Vivaz (poor screen in sunlight, inconsistent interface(s), exposed camera glass, no camera flash) - see the AAS review
  • Motorola Milestone (poor keyboard, poor keyboard and, yes, a poor keyboard, ruining the device's USP) - see the Phones Show review
  • HTC Legend (screen a little small, Sense UI a bit overwhelming, poor battery cover arrangement, usual OLED in sunlight complaint) - see the Phones Show review
  • HTC Hero (screen small again, plasticky, speaker quiet) - see the Phones Show

If the above seems as though I'm being picky, then you'd be right, but remember that I do this for a living and that I picked just as big a list of negatives for the N97 at the top of this article. We're still a long way from the perfect, faultless smartphone.

Nokia N97

Balancing the N97's fault list, long though it is, are some unique characteristics, for me at least:

Transflective

For starters, the screen's almost unique among Symbian-powered touchscreen phones in that it's transflective (the only other is the Satio), meaning that you can actually see it in direct sunlight. It's not perfectly clear and it's a long way from iPhone or S60-non-touch contrast, but it's better than the OLED screen of the i8910 HD or the TFTs used by most other touchscreen phones in this ecosystem. 

N97 mini and N97 in bright sunlight

In sunlight, the N97 mini screen (left), without the transflective layer, is distinctly harder to read than the N97's, which has a transflective layer that is able to use some ambient light to reflect back through the LCD elements... Most Nokia/Symbian touchscreen phones don't have this layer.

I was in London this week for a meeting and decided to walk the mile or so each way from the station to the venue as it was a gorgeous sunny day. Using the Samsung i8910 HD, I had extreme difficulty in reading the screen for directions in Google Maps, without having to explicitly seek out shady spots. Turning to the N97, the maps were at least visible.

Hero battery life

The other showstopping problem I had in London was battery life on the i8910 HD. You may remember that I did a similar 'power user's day out' on the Nokia N97 mini last year - and it let me down, running out of steam by early afternoon - patently not good enough. The i8910 HD has the larger 1500mAh battery and (theoretically) power saving OLED screen, but the faster processor and the OS itself seem to eat power and I was down to one bar of battery life by the time I neared home at the end of the day - and I hadn't really pushed the phone too hard.

The Nokia N97 has the same nominal battery capacity as the i8910 HD, 1500mAh, but seems to be significantly more frugal in terms of using this up. I also suspect Nokia's BP-4L cell is more efficient than Samsung's A8 cell and, whatever the N97's other faults, running through batteries isn't one of them. The BP-4L is the same 'hero' battery as used in the E61i, E90, E71, E72, E52 and E55, of course (among others), all of which have superb battery life. And there's the ease of swapping batteries between the N97 and any of the above (I have several in my permanent armoury), which is another distinct attraction.

Retail Nokia N97 - the 1500mAh battery

(For really power-intensive trips, there's also the 3600mAh Mugen battery, but that does make a bit of a brute out of the N97 in terms of form factor!)

FM transmitter

There seems to be some confusion about FM transmitters. This is not, repeat not the same as an FM radio. Almost every phone has the latter. An FM transmitter (only in a handful of smartphones, the N97 being one of them) broadcasts the audio from the phone on a frequency you choose to any FM radios nearby. The main use of this is in-car, where you can play podcasts and music back through your car stereo system without having to fiddle around with cassette adapters, aux sockets, and so on. It's a bit of a legacy feature in some ways - I mean it's an analogue system! - but it's also really, really useful, especially on long journeys. 

And no, in answer to what you're thinking, the car behind probably can't pick up your broadcasts - the transmissions only have a range of a couple of metres!

Camera glass protection

As with an FM transmitter, this (somewhat obvious) feature is surprisingly rare - almost every smartphone that you'll be able to think of has an unprotected camera glass - only devices like the Sony Ericsson Satio, Nokia N900, N95, N82, N85 and N86 have mechanical protection. And yes, I know I proved that for most purposes scratches on camera glass didn't make much difference, but there's the more common problem (I've found) - that of fingerprints and general dust and grease accumulating. These do make a difference, yielding obviously blurry photos - yes, it's easy enough to stop and wipe the glass on some clean clothing, but with a mechanical protector the glass stays clean, dry and scratch-free far more easily.

(left) the unprotected camera glass on the N97 mini, (right) the protective/activation slide on the N97

There's also the not-insignificant factor of being able to launch the Camera application by sliding open the camera protector. This is very intuitive and makes the smartphone far more 'camera-like' in this role.

The principle reason most smartphones don't have such protection (/camera-launching capability) is bulk, of course. Adding an extra 2 or 3mm just for the luxury of a little more plastic is a tough design decision - as we saw in this week's launch of the Nokia N8, with bulk being one of the prime reasons why there's no camera glass protection. Ditto for the N97 mini, shown above. Regardless of bulk (ha!), the N97 has this.

32GB mass memory

Although I'll freely admit that 17GB or so of my 32GB is currently free, it's still freeing to know that I can stick almost any file of any size in there, or install any application, no matter how large, or load up many video files, without constantly worrying about running out of space. It's effectively a bottomless bucket.

There aren't many smartphones with this much internal storage - I can only think of the Nokia X6 32GB and the iPhone 32GB as competitors in terms of space - and neither of those has a microSD card slot to add another 32GB! So I can walk around with 64GB of file system in my pocket - which is pretty impressive, still.

QWERTY keyboard

Having applied my own metrics to the various Symbian smartphone QWERTY keyboards in the past, the N97 came out pretty badly - numerically. Principally this was down to the relatively few 'extra' keys and lack of key travel, but the numbers don't really do it justice. The N97's QWERTY keypad isn't a patch on the E90's for example, but it's actually quite usable. Now that the v20 firmware added 'long press' functionality in, for easier access to the 'function' characters, most N97 users will tell you that the restricted key set isn't a problem in real life.

Retail Nokia N97 - keyboard

Above all though, the salient point is that the N97 has a physical QWERTY keyboard. The best way to appreciate having one (or to work out if you need one) is to go a week with a QWERTY-equipped device and then a week with a T9-keypad phone (and then a week with a 'virtual' QWERTY touchscreen device). The combination of a real keyboard and a full-screen display (i.e. you don't have to sacrifice most of your display to showing a virtual keyboard) can't be beaten, in my opinion. The iPhone's virtual keyboard intelligence arguably comes close for general text but then the physical keyboard streaks away once you start hitting names, places and irregular text.

Angled display

The patented N97 alloy hinge is unique in automatically and quickly presenting the full screen at an angle, for easier viewing. It's not easier for general text entry, mind you - a flat slider would work just as well. But when it comes to having media or content displayed on your desk or table - for example, watching a video - having the screen propped up internally is a massively better solution than with the likes of the candy bar iPhone/i8910/Nexus One/HD2, which all have to be propped up with a book or toast rack (or similar!)

Video playback on N97

Great camera

For still photos, the N97 has essentially the same great 5 megapixel Carl Zeiss-lensed camera as the original N95. But this isn't a complaint. The aperture is large enough to gather light for most outdoor situations and there's dual LED for impulse shots indoors or for using as a video light.

Retail Nokia N97 - camera

In fact, the number of people standing up and showing off their N97-shot masterpieces has risen sharply in recent months. Compare these shots to photos taken on any non-Nokia five megapixel cameras and I think you'll be surprised. 

It's a Nokia

This sounds a bit obvious, but in the wider smartphone world, each platform and manufacturer has its own pros and cons. In the Nokia world, we're talking about Ovi Maps, principally, with free voice guided sat nav, for walking or driving, anywhere in the world, forever. And recent versions of Ovi Maps have included better and better points of interest and place finding, so it's turning into quite a big deal.

Also, by going Nokia, you get regular firmware updates (much needed in this case, admittedly), and a host of extras, nearly all of them free, from Beta Labs and from the main Ovi Store.


The nine huge plus points above have hopefully made you pause and think - if only for a minute or two. There's simply nothing else in the world that can match all (or even most) of the above. Which means that if even (say) 7 of the 9 attributes are vital to what you want from a smartphone then only be achieved with the 'love it or hate it, you can't ignore it' Nokia N97....

Living with the N97 is rarely trouble-free and ultimately limited in terms of trying to do any one task really well. But I still maintain that, with a little care and attention, the N97 can do more for me than anything else. Pitched originally as a multimedia flagship by Nokia (and priced accordingly), the title of 'consummate all rounder' seems to work best these days - there's literally nothing it can't attempt.

Steve Litchfield, All About Symbian, 30th April 2010

Nokia N97


 

Filed: Home > Features > Why the Nokia N97 sucks... and why it still rules

Platforms: General, S60 5th Edition

Categories: Comment, Hardware

Discussion

VoReason
In my experience with the i8910, I found that the battery life was actually very very good, even superior to the N97. The issue is that the phone drops battery bars too quickly. The last bar of battery can easily last through a whole day of moderate use.

Just another sign of Samsung's poor software abilities.
Dazzy
I am beginning to regret buying the Vivaz, don't get me wrong I love it and now with up to 10 widget filled homescreens the interface is great (sorry cant reveal much more).

BUT the lack of indication from SE about a Firmware update to fix some of the niggling things is beginning to annoy me.

I really want a Nokia device with a Qwerty keyboard but the N8 has made me think twice, I wonder if Nokia will ever do a Symbian 3 version of the N97 with much improved hardware. Maybe a Qwerty version of the N8. C6 interested me for a while just not sure if it will have the hardware to be good enough though.
jApi NL
Lately I'am following Posterous on his N97 Photo Journey through South - Africa :
http://myphotographer.posterous.com/

:) Regards jApi NL
morpheus2702
"It's a Nokia."

It's all you really had to say Steve... :rolleyes:
brrip
"why it rules"

nokia managed to split the homescreen up into tiny little components distributed across different firmware files so that it can't be easily ported to other symbian phones.
carman58
Very good and fair article, my N97 is in for repair at the moment (lens cover, gps antenna and right speaker) and I'm missing it like crazy. I am using my old N95 8Gig and it just shows how good the N97 is ! Just hope the CPW pull their finger out and get my phone back to me soon,N95 is/was a great phone, but touch screen with physical qwerty is the future, and I'm sure the N9 will be a rock solid replacement for the N97 (I hope)
Brendan Donegan
Note that most Satio's aren't buggy, particularly after the recent firmware update (I've asked lot's of Satio owners), Steve's seemed to have something wrong with it ;)
Unregistered
The N97 has this memory problem, that's undeniable - but it's down to the way people use it. I've never encountered the memory problem.
spice3d
I've stuck with my N97 as well, but you didn't mention the issue with the flash bleeding. I hate it!
Unregistered
People dived in an bought the N97 to quickly not reading reviews about it,even Nokia were reading reviews themselves an released the N97mini to stop themselves getting slagged down,thats the current trend with the younger generation nowdays just buying a mobile on its looks not the functions an software on it,i bought the Satio myself because i knew the software was same as the 5800 ,i liked very much because the Speakers an Software on the 5800 was brilliant,had no trouble with Satio an even use the Nokia Ovi music player to download Songs to my Satio,an will stick with it until the N8 is finally released,Nokia always outshow SE phones with the speakers,i bought the Vivaz an only used for a day until i realised the speakers on it were way below par an no equaliser on it,Nokia thougth the Querty keypad would succede but not everyone seems happy using it,if Nokia were the ones who only produced the thinner mobiles the Querty keypad might have worked,but it makes Nokia phone to Broad an Heavy,thats why the N900 software should have been put on the N97 or N97 mini as the N900 was to thick an heavy for most people
slitchfield
@spice3d: the LED flash bleed was due to the camera glass microscratches - the fixed glass and slider also fix the flash bleed.
xerxes
Everything you say may be true Steve, but the main problem with the N97 (or at least the Mini that I bought and trialed for a week) is that it is a horrible horrible horrible phone to actually use!

I came to the phone actively looking for a way to replace the iPhone I have to use for work with a non-Apple product. Think about that for a second. I was prepared to spend £200 of my own money in order to not carry an Apple logo and to get a bit more functionality and freedom, but the actual experience of using the phone was so horrible that I had to return to the Apple dark side with my tail between my legs.

And this was not a reaction to Symbian (I have owned and used an N73, an N95 and an E61i in the past) or to S60 5th (I have no problem using my wife's 5800). It was purely because the the device was so underpowered at the hardware level for what a power user expects to be able to do with a flagship device in 2010. How the N97 design team can possibly have concluded that it was a good idea to save $10 per device by using a 128Mb RAM chip and a slow processor is beyond me.

I have said several times on these pages that Symbian is being held back by Nokia's penny pinching hardware designs and bizare lack of quality control far more than the actual OS or UI layer. The problem now is that many early adopters are moving away from Symbian as a platform and that is a leading indicator of decline for any computing platform.

You only have to look at the N97 forum on this website to see what I am talking about. Long term Symbian flagship users whose experience of using the N97 has been so bad that they are now moving away to iPhones or (mainly) Android.
And these people are not leaving because of the GPS or the lense cover. They have fought through those issues. They are leaving because they cannot stand using the N97 anymore and many say they won't be returning to Symbian.

So the N97 doesn't rule. It sucks so badly that the N8 is going to have to be truely outstanding if Nokia wants to stem its user attrition at the high end of the market and undo some me the damage that the N97 has done to the company's thought leadership position in Europe and Asia.

Nokia needs to understand that they need to up their game massively in many key areas if they want to get back to being more than a low margin provider of utility products. That's a hard lesson to learn when you've been top dog in your industry for such a long time and articles like this don't help. They perpetuate the message that "things aren't really that bad" which really isn't what Nokia needs right now. So show Nokia a bit of tough love and tell it how it is.

The N97 stinks from a power user perspective and Nokia needs to do much, much better.
rafiii
The problem with the N97 is that it is a good all around smartphone. It is hard to replace it without loosing something.
Unregistered
I am quite satisfied with my N97. After un-installing the NGage app and setting everything that can be set to use the E: drive, everything just works.

I admit that the 128 MB RAM and underspec'ed vanilla ARM 11 CPU takes some of the joy out of it, and Nokia deserves to be punished for that.

BUT when push comes to shove, it still pulls away from many of the Androids and iPhones. I've used both the Nexus, Hero, iPhone 3GS, SE Vivaz etc., and yes, the N97 is slower, but despite that it is still the most versatile smartphone. Steve is right, it does almost anything - only culprit is speed, RAM and the occasional clunky UI.

No doubt it is a "hate it" or "love it" device.

I am keeping mine, until it's successor comes out.

Android is too limited, sketchy and fragmented for my taste...and considering the CPU specs on eg. the Nexus One, also quite slow.

The iPhone is a good device for many, but way to limited and unflexible for me.

...and oh - the camera on the N97 still blows the competition out of the water, hands down...and it is not even the best camera compared to other Nokia phones.
Hih
Flash bleed is still there. After many, many fixes. It's not all about scratches. :rolleyes:
tnkgrl
Couple corrections:
- The N79 also has a lens cover
- The N900 also has 32 GB buil-in storage
tnkgrl
Quote:
Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
You only have to look at the N97 forum on this website to see what I am talking about. Long term Symbian flagship users whose experience of using the N97 has been so bad that they are now moving away to iPhones or (mainly) Android.
And these people are not leaving because of the GPS or the lense cover. They have fought through those issues. They are leaving because they cannot stand using the N97 anymore and many say they won't be returning to Symbian.

So the N97 doesn't rule. It sucks so badly that the N8 is going to have to be truely outstanding if Nokia wants to stem its user attrition at the high end of the market and undo some me the damage that the N97 has done to the company's thought leadership position in Europe and Asia.
This is spot on!

@Steve, you are such an apologist...

The N8 better be special to get the mindshare back: http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2010/04/...-the-nokia-n8/
Unregistered
It can attempt many things, but fails on most of them. That's my experience after 7 months. I'll hit a situation that I realise I can use my phone for, whip out the N97 and then fight with it for five minutes trying to find what I want, get it going, handle the crashes, wait for the lag. By the time I have the everything ready to go, the situation has passed (a couple of times with people doing it five times faster on an iphone). That's not what I want a smartphone to be. The N97 can do a lot, but none of it is intuitive or responsive enough to be useful.
Unregistered
After using N900 I ain't coming back to my N97 no more!

But N8 is tempting me. :(
widehead
It is running S60 5th Edition ergo it sucks.

I'm still waiting for this ridiculous touch fad to pass.
Jaggz
Always strikes me as a bit odd that you don't own an iPhone 3GS, if only for comparison sake. Just saying...
Unregistered
How about the N900? It clearly matches the N97 and leaves it in the dust. Here's a sound response to this article: http://www.mobilitynigeria.com/2010/...d-by-the-n900/
jah
I can't believe how poor the N97 is. When look back at some of the great Smartphones Nokia made like the 7710 and 9500 (and E90) you wonder why Nokia's software engineering skills can decline over time instead of improving. But I am looking forward to the N8 or the N98. But my favourite device is the HTC Desire (battery life much better than the iPhone and not that bad in the sun shine).
Tenkom
n900 has almost all of the superlatives on steves list(lacking in the maps department). and most of the weaknesses of the n97 like the underpowered cpu and ram are not present(still lots of plastic).
It is in no way harder to use than an n97(unless you want it to be) and it has a much more modern UI with vastly superior multimedia functions like divx playback and better youtube performance.
Froschy
I agree with xerxes and tnkgrl. The n97 is terrible, sure it does lots of things but nothing well and this is not even taking into account for the premium that Nokia charged for the hardware that they cheaped out on. In this matter I can't believe that the engineers would have been happy with this hardware but rather it would have been a business decision to make more money for Nokia, very shortsighted and a complete fail on Nokia's part.

These apologist articles are not helping Nokia, they really need to be told how things actually are.

Full thread: 44 Comments / Post New Comment

Search

Navigation

Social

Advert

Translate