Analysis, tutorials and tips for your Nokia and Samsung Phones

The fastest smartphone in the west? Text input speeds compared

Published by Steve Litchfield at 6:42 UTC, June 8th 2009

Steve Litchfield directly compares speeds of text entry on a range of PDAs and smartphones and draws some conclusions about design and general form factor. [original article 2006, updated 2007 and June 2009]

There are, of course, as many different form factors for PDAs and smartphones as there are stars in the sky. Well, almost, and only if you count all the different subtle differences in weight and size as well. But at some point, you're to have to put information into this device, if only to scribble in a Calendar appointment or a new contact's details. Or perhaps to write a few emails or text messages. Or maybe even to write up a report or continue your first novel. In each case, the speed at which you can easily get text into each device will play a major part in which is the best one to choose.

As a rule, the larger the device, the more chance it'll have a useable QWERTY keyboard of some kind, a necessity if you plan to input more than about 500 words a week. To test the speeds of a variety of typical mobile hardware, I first needed to think up a suitable test. Here's the text I used:

"Train arrives in Nottingham at 15:20, Pete will meet me on the platform. Remember to bring meeting notes."
and
"I resigned myself to the fact that I no longer had 20/20 vision"

32 words in total, but including numbers, some punctuation and an odd name (Nottingham, not Pete!). In the case of each device, I practised a little first and then timed myself entering the strings of text, correcting any typos as I went. In each case, I did the test twice and included the average result below.

 

PDA or smartphone   Class [* = now obsolete] Time for test text input (secs)  Calculated words per minute (wpm) Estimated number of comfortable words input in a typical day
Psion Series 5mx  5mx Keyboarded, hinged palmtop*  49  39  1000
Nokia 9500  9500 Series 80 keyboarded communicator *  52  37  500
T-Mobile MDA Pro  MDA Pro Windows Mobile 5 keyboarded communicator *  53  37  500
Nokia E90  E90 S60 3rd Edition communicator  55  35  500
HTC Touch Pro 2 Touch Pro 2 
Windows Mobile 6 keyboarded communicator  58  33  500
Nokia 9300 9300  Series 80 keyboarded communicator*  60  32  250
HTC TyTN 2  TyTN 2  Windows Mobile 6 keyboarded communicator  65  29  200
Nokia E70  N70 S60 3rd Edition device with usable but slightly gimmicky fold-over keyboard*  66  28  200
Nokia E61i  E61i S60 3rd edition communicator with thumb keyboard  67  28  200
Apple iPhone 3G  iPhone 3G Tablet smartphone with virtual qwerty in both portrait and landscape modes, plus writing aids (figure on the right is best speed, in landscape mode)  67  28  200
Nokia N97  N97 S60 5th Edition hinged slider  72  27  150
Nokia 5800  5800 S60 5th Edition tablet, with virtual qwerty in landscape mode  75  27  150
HTC Touch Diamond  Touch Diamond 2 Typical Windows Mobile PDA phone, using stylus on on-screen keyboard  96  20  100
Nokia N95 8GB  N95 8GB Typical S60 candy-bar smartphone, using predictive text  101  18  100
Sony Ericsson P900  P900 Stylus-based UIQ smartphone*  122  16  60
Palm TX  TX Typical stylus-based PDA, using Palm OS and Graffiti 2 character recognition*  123  16  60
Nokia N95 8GB  N95 8GB S60 candy-bar smartphone, using multi-tap on number keypad  163  11  40

 

Most notable from the above table is the bottom row. The vast number of people around the world who use multi-tap input are using by FAR the slowest method of all. If you're still using multi-tap input then look at the figures above and resolve to learn to use predictive text more.

In terms of the spread of speeds, there are no huge surprises. Where there's a qwerty keyboard involved, speeds will be higher, and the bigger the keyboard the faster your text input speeds. I've included the final column as my estimate of how many words you'd want to input on each device every day before you started to get heartily fed up. For example, if you know for a fact that you average half a dozen appointments, a couple of new contacts, a new note, three SMSs and six emails a day, a quick 'back of an envelope' calculation shows that you'll be typing somewhere in the region of 250 words a day. Look in the table above and you can quickly eliminate all the slower devices. As always, we're all different though, as is borne out by the tremendous range of hardware form factors represented above.

You'll note that I haven't factored in using an external Bluetooth keyboard. Buying such an accessory - obviously - brings most of these devices up to exactly the same level, and there's no reason why you can't type almost as fast on a Bluetooth keyboard as you would on your home desktop computer. If you need to input significant text and yet you fancy the smaller size of the devices at the bottom end of the table above, then an external keyboard that you can connect when needed makes a lot of sense.

Of note especially is the way the brand new Nokia N97 achieves only a modest rating, slowest of all keyboarded PDAs I've ever used, proving only marginally quicker than the virtual keyboard of its much cheaper sister device, the 5800 XpressMusic. Strictly for ad-hoc, occasional use? I'd love to talk to the device's designer at some point. It does seem as though potential text entry speeds have been declining steadily over the years, not increasing, as you'd expect. Also of note is the winner, the legendary Psion 5mx, which was discontinued a decade ago! Dare I mention that Symbian's own David Wood still uses a 5mx to this day for his day to day note taking and Calendar use?

Here, for your musings, delectation, interest and amusement, are close-ups of palmtop and Communicator keyboards, in chronological order, from 1998 to 2009 - care to spot a trend?

Psion 5mx keyboard

Psion Series 5mx

Nokia 9000 keyboard

Nokia 9000 Communicator

Nokia 9210 keyboard

Nokia 9210 Communicator

Nokia 9500 keyboard

Nokia 9500 Communicator

Nokia E90 keyboard

Nokia E90 Communicator

Nokia N97 keyboard

Nokia N97

Steve Litchfield, Updated June 2009, for AAS and 3-Lib


Relevant link: my older article on qwerty keyboards on smartphones and my interactive device comparison Grid.

Categories: Comment, Hardware
Platforms: Series 60, Series 80, Series 90, UIQ, General, N-Gage

Feature Discussion

rleader
Excellent article, as are most found on allaboutsymbian! Is there time for you to include the 'Omnia' i8910 HD (S60 3.x fifth edition) in your table? I still have my Psion 5MX 8mb (not 8gb like the i8910!) almost pristine, back in its box. Yes, I did a lot on that keyboard in its day... Cheers!
nisched
first comment? we'll see.

not sure I approve of 27-28 wpm translating from 200-150 words you could conveniently write per day. that feels wrong.

also, I remember you don't really like word correction algorithms but that iphone goes quite quick and completely depends on auto-correction. personally I can't stand the iphone for typing but my trusty E70 is great. on t9 I hate stumbling over complex words its not that slow for the odd text but very stumbly on unusual words auto-correction is like that too.

cheers,
dj
Unregistered
damn
slitchfield
@nisched: No, I LOVE the iPhone's auto-correction. What I don't like is 'prediction' software, where you have to keep looking up at the screen to see what word is being suggested and then decide whether to accept it and then have to do the appropriate actions to do so - it would have been quicker to just type it etc.

The iPhone does this properly. It spots what you MEANT to type and corrects it more or less silently. I can't see why Nokia doesn't do the same for input on its phones, it's really not that hard to do.
sapporobaby
Hi Steve,

Doesn't the E75 more or less correct the spelling as you go? It seems similar to the iPhone when deciding what you meant. I do however, have to look at the screen from time to time to make sure it spelled what I wanted.
Unregistered
T9 may be a bit slower for new words but once you've entered the words you use the most day to day it can be very fast (for a keypad). I can type a quick message without looking at my phone till it's done and then I only look at it for a sec to check it's not predicted the wrong words

I've got a N95 8GB and just gone on a type test web site and got between 20 and 25wpm from a couple of tests. Don't know what's up with Steve's thumbs!
Unregistered
Hi Steve,

What about E71?
DervMan
It must depend very much on what you get used to. I used PalmOS devices with Graffiti for the longest time and was proficient in the script - quick and comfortable to use.

My E71's keyboard is less comfortable to use by comparison and no quicker.

Both pale in comparison with a portable, foldable keyboard. Very few comfort issues whatsoever and easy to touch type on.
Unregistered
Just typed it and timed it on my Nokia N82 and completed it in 55, 35 words per minute? This puts it 4th on the list. . I can type faster using T9 than I can any other method I've tried, without looking to. I'm not even that quick. Many people I know can type much faster.
maartenmk
I for one do miss prediction with word suggestion on s60. Maybe it will not help much for T9 predictive input, but for multi-tap it would surely save a lot of button-presses.
And when you write in more than one language regularly like I do, T9 language switching makes it almost not worth using.

But even with T9 on, sometimes you are just sure the phone already knows what word you are typing, and it still lets you spell it out!
Besides, it's not in the way is it? You can just ignore it if you want. With auto-correction, even a very clever system will get it wrong sometimes. Very annoying.
Dynite
I completely disagree with multi-tap being the slowest.

touch screen input requires you to wait for an incredibly long time (comparitively speaking) between presses as opposed to physical buttons, especially when typing the same letter twice. (I know u can use the arrow but that's hardly any quicker)

Also considering most people have been using T9 or multitap for the past 10 years, I very much doubt it's the worst of all; in fact it's probably one of the fastest.


Also, no E71 on the list? Tsk.
slitchfield
"Doesn't the E75 more or less correct the spelling as you go? It seems similar to the iPhone when deciding what you meant. I do however, have to look at the screen from time to time to make sure it spelled what I wanted."

Do you know, I'd forgotten about that. And presumably on the E71 and E63 and N97 as well. Partly because it doesn't work very well, of course. E.g. Mistype 'on' as 'om' and get 'omnipotence'. Yeeeeess..... that matches my keystrokes, I don't think.... Better than nothing in many cases but world away from the intelligence behind the iPhone's auto-corrective aids.

"Don't know what's up with Steve's thumbs!"

Well, admittedly I'm not the fastest texter in the world, but note that my test text included several things which trip up predictive text. Try my test test and time yourself, please!

"Just typed it and timed it on my Nokia N82 and completed it in 55, 35 words per minute"

You have my respect, sir!
Unregistered
I can assure you that I'm around 4 times faster with the QWERTY keyboard on my E90 than I am with the numeric keypad.

Perhaps the problem is I'm a 40 something man and not a 12 year old girl. This means I have big hands and spend my working day writing emails on a full sized keyboard, not texting celeb chat under my desk.
maartenmk
Steve,

I looked at an online typing test, and it mentioned that WPM is actually based not on real words, but on standardised word-units, each 5 keystrokes, spaces included.

That would make your text 35.4 WPM-units long (and it makes your typing speed look more impressive!). Or 34, if the quotation marks and the "and" were not part of your actual test, that is not entirely clear to me.
nisched
just tried it on T9 and my E70. I was a bit quicker than steve and quicker on the qwerty than T9 but not much. however, it felt much nicer and less manic on the qwerty maybe because of the extra space/buttons. very subjective though, qwerty familiarity is high with this one.

Steve, thanks for the auto-correct comment. also, like the idea of having the same on the N97/E75 although obviously it is no use if it doesn't work. more detail on this? sapporobaby sounded happy with it but your "omnipresent" put-down was worrying.

I preferred T9 to qwerty on the 5800. easier to hit the right key and I hated the portrait qwerty on the iphone. too small even with auto-correct. but then you can get used to almost anything if you try, I like my E70 but many hate it.
snoyt
Two thumbing an touchscreened N800 tested slightly faster as a iPhone and some other mini-qwerty devices. A hardware keyboard mostly increases the screenspace for viewing and composition and allows you to focus more on composing instead of typing. Remember most people think and type at the same time. Can you do this with T9? This is why qwerty rocks vs touchscreen keyboards. Mini-qwerty also beats the crap out of T9 when doing mixed languages. It is simple as that.
Unregistered
have you tried it with a blackberry? im curious how that compares. personally i just got 45 seconds on my first try which makes it the fastest on the list but then the blackberry is my daily phone.
Dynite
All attempts to become the world's fastest texter have to use the following two sentences: "The razor-toothed piranhas of the genera Serrasalmus and Pygocentrus are the most ferocious freshwater fish in the world. In reality they seldom attack a human."

Competitors are not allowed to use spelling aids or a predictive text programme on their phone.
Unregistered
First try I did it in 65 seconds, so that's 29.5wpm.
Second try i did it in 60 seconds, so that's right on 32wpm.

Plus it's 2am here so my ability is hampered!

I'm thinking if I can get that fast with predictive text, I should easily be able to hit 45+wpm with a decent qwerty pad.
Huschke2009
I have no idea as to what text you use or how fast you normally type, but at least I can type 38wpm on my Nokia 5800.
Huschke2009
Ok I reread the article and tryed it againg. 30 wpm :) , but still :)
jonnybruha
N95 8gb is at the bottom? Learn T9, man! I can smoke ALL those numbers with a 9-key and I'm sure a lot of readers can too!
Unregistered
How do you measure the WPM? I tried Dynite's sentence and I had 44 seconds. And dit an awful lot of mistakes. Interestingly, before I cut my nails I was hovering around 50 seconds for the same text!
^Angel^
Is than even possible that i-phone is faster in writing messages than N97?! Is it a joke or what?! How can u be faster on a touchscreen than on a qwerty keybord?! Do u have pen-styled-fingers?! =D
slitchfield
"N95 8gb is at the bottom? Learn T9, man! I can smoke ALL those numbers with a 9-key and I'm sure a lot of readers can too!"

Did you look through the whole table? Ahem. The N95 8GB (representing numeric keypad phones) is in the table TWICE.

"Is than even possible that i-phone is faster in writing messages than N97?! Is it a joke or what?! How can u be faster on a touchscreen than on a qwerty keybord?!"

You try it. The iPhone's superb writing aids mean that you can tap away and get EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER WRONG IN A WORD - and it'll still guess the right word and insert it! I'm not being an iPhone fanboy here - just appreciating their software tech. Try it on an iPhone or iPod Touch, especially in landscape mode - you can get some VERY fast speeds up, only ruined a little by having to put in real names and punctuation etc.

41 Comments / Post New Comment

Copyright Notes || Contact Us || Privacy Policy (Ellie)