All About Symbian - News from the Symbian Ecosystem...

Symbian Signed Announce New $20 'Express Signed' Component

Published by Ewan Spence at 19:16 UTC, October 16th 2007

Symbian has announced a number of changes to the Symbian Signed program at today’s Smartphone Show in London’s ExCeL center. Joining the existing ‘Certified Signed’ and ‘ Open Signed’ areas of the program is a new ‘Express Signed’ service, which should be welcomed by a large number of smaller developers.

Open Signed – allows a maximum of 1000 certificates (as opposed to the previous 100 certificates) to be signed by the programmer and shipped out on a one to one basis. Initally used so developers could sort out beta testers without sending potentially buggy applications through testing, this has been opened up so that small business users, open source groups and communities can make use of the system.

Certified Signed is the closest to the existing process – where an application is tested by an independent house and applications can access the ‘sensitive’ functions on the phone. A quick check round the recommended testing houses on the Symbian Signed web pages gave the current costs for this as… Sogeti HT (560 euros for first, 280 euros for subsequent); NSTL (250 Euros); MphasIS (185 Euros for first, 150 Euros for subsequent).

Express Signed is the new program announced today and is targeted at applications that don’t use the seven sensitive API’s as noted by Symbian. Programmers with a Publisher ID will be able to self-sign an application for a much reduced price (Symbian are quoting in the region of $20). This is actually a pretty smart move – the majority of applications, and certainly those at the leisure/gaming end of the market will welcome a reduced testing regime – and it should also encompass themes as well.

If you don’t have a publisher ID, it appears that MphasIS is offering a price for passive applications, which ranges from 40 Euros (1-5 signings) down to 25 Euros (50-100 signings) and a jolly ‘contact us if you are doing over 100 signings.’

While the small print will be worth going over, the new Express Signed program is a good way forward. While the industry and commentators have acknowledged the need of something like the Symbian Signed program to ‘protect the user/networks/IT support help desks’, the actual Symbian Signed program has had a rocky road on the way to acceptance. The changes detailed today, mostly derived for talking to the users of the service and interested parties, are another step forward to reduce the cost and complexity of Symbian Signed, and should be applauded.

Ewan Spence

Categories: Developer
Platforms: General, S60 3rd Edition, UIQ 3

News Discussion

cheesewhisk
I've been part way through the process with Mphasis, and the end result is that if you want a menu icon that launches your Flash Lite content, you need to create a .exe file to launch the Flash file. But as soon as you include a .exe file in your .sis the content becomes 'active' and must be tested using the 'active content' criteria.

The main gripe I have with this is that instead of the €40 for passive content it then becomes €185 for active testing, even though there's pretty much nothing to test. Sure you need a pop-up message telling the user that you may use network traffic by going onto the internet, but this in theory can be achieved by adding a privacy statement, which is conveniently part of the packaging tool swf2go,

Also, even for passive content you need a publishers ID which (thankfully) is now $200 from Trustcenter , rather than the $400 it used to be from verisign.

The whole process is still a nightmare, and some bright spark should set up a service that takes a .swf and an icon and returns you with a .sis that's been through the whole signing process for you.

Full thread: 1 Comment / Post New Comment

Copyright Notes || Contact Us || Privacy Policy (Ellie)