All About Symbian - Nokia and Samsung hardware and software reviews

Sony Ericsson P1i - part 1: design and hardware

Published by Rafe Blandford at 21:48 UTC, August 13th 2007 under Hardware in UIQ 3|| 50 Comments / Post New Comment
Version Reviewed:
Score:

The P1i is Sony Ericsson’s new flagship smartphone product. Running the touchscreen variant of UIQ 3.0 on Symbian OS 9.1, with WCDMA, GSM and Wi-Fi connectivity, a QWERTY keyboard or handwriting recognition for text input and a 3.2 megapixel camera, it is well specified and a powerful smartphone.

The P1i uses the same UIQ 3 software platform as the P990 and there are relatively few software differences between the two phones. However, the P1i has double the RAM of the P990 and this has important implications for software operation and stability which we will discuss more fully in the second part of this review. In this first part of the review we concentrate on the hardware which has also had a very significant overhaul.

Sony Ericsson P1i

Overall Design

Although the P1i is the latest in the venerable P series of phones, a family ancestry which stretches back to 2002, it represents something of a departure from its predecessors. Whereas its earlier incarnations all featured optional flips (featuring numeric keypads) and a flip closed software mode which offered a subset of the phone's software functionality, the P1i presents a form factor more closely related to Sony Ericsson’s M600 communicator. The P1i takes the form factor and styling of the M600 and combines it with the hardware features of the P990i and adds a number of significant improvements of its own.

The obvious result of the form factor change is a significant size reduction, previous P series devices have tended to be on the chunky side. At 106 x 55 x 17 mm the P1i is a comfortable, pocketable size, and compared to the P990 (114 x 57 x 25 mm) is nearly 33% thinner. Managing to squeeze the form to this extent is a considerable achievement and, while the P1i remains relatively heavy at 125g, this is 25g less than the P990i and it retains the pleasing sense of solidity which is sometimes missing in competing devices.

Sony Ericsson P1i

The unique form factor of the earlier P series definitely has its fans, with flip closed mode offering an excellent one-handed experience. However, the reduction in size, in my opinion, should easily outweigh the lack of a flip for most people.

The P1i uses a subtly different implementation of UIQ 3 to the P990 - SoftkeyStyleTouch versus PenStyle - it's now better suited to one handed usage. From the screenshots below you can see some of the differences between the SoftkeyStyleTouch (P1i) and PenStyle (P990) implementations of UIQ 3. You will note that the status bar and on-screen 'back' key move from the bottom to the top and that that action/command softkeys are always found on the bottom of the display. The main menu is accessed via the 'More' softkey as opposed to a drop down menu from the top of the screen.

P990 Screenshot

P990i (PenStyle) and P1i (SoftkeyStyleTouch)

The P1i screen is marginally smaller that the P990i, but its quality has been markedly improved with much better performance outdoors in sunlight.

The P1i is much sleeker than previous models, owing more to the styling found in Sony Ericsson’s range of feature phones. The materials used in the case are a combination of brushed aluminum (framing the front and sides), a hard shiny plastic (front face and keyboard) and a hard rubber material (rear and battery cover). The overall build quality is excellent and the materials have been intelligently placed. The rubber material on the rear of the device improves grip when holding the device, especially when using the keyboard for two handed text entry.

Sony Ericsson P1i

The back of the device houses the main 3.2 megapixel auto-focus camera along with a dual LED flash. The camera lens is slightly recessed into its housing, providing some limited protection. The right hand side of the device features the camera capture button, the memory card slot and the internet key. By default, this key is configured to launch the Web browser but this can be changed in Control panel. For power users the most useful configuration is to set this as a shortcut to the task manager, so as to enhance multi-tasking functionality.

The left hand side of the P1i features the two principal navigation controls – the scroll wheel and the 'back' key.  P990 users may notice the absence of the hardware lock key and the multimedia key (play/pause media) - for manufacturers, there is always a balance to be drawn between simplicity, utility and costs. In this case, I think the correct decision has been made. The key lock can be activated by a long press on the back key and multimedia controls are generally more conveniently located on headsets.

left side  left side

 

Keyboard and data input

The P1i, like the P990i, has a full QWERTY keyboard at the bottom of the screen. However, the P1i’s keyboard, as with the rest of its styling, owes much more to the M600 than to its immediate P series predecessor. The P990i’s keyboard was cramped with small keys which was uncomfortable to use for prolonged periods. By contrast the P1i keyboard eschews the 'key for each letter' approach and instead uses a layout of 20 keys with the top 15 keys pivoting for a key press on the left and right side of each button. Each of these pivot keys therefore effectively operates as two keys. The usual QWERTY layout is preserved, with each letter sharing a key with another letter (for example the top right key serves both O and P). This layout is further refined by the use of a shift for capitalisation and an ALT key to access numbers (the central keys), punctuation and various symbols. Although this sounds rather convoluted, it works very well in practice and the larger keys mean that typing is more accurate (especially for those with larger hands). It also allows the P1i to be narrower than other phones with fully QWERTY keyboards - this is readily apparent when comparing the P1i and devices like the E61 side by side.

P1i vs E61
 
Although not immediately apparent, there are significant differences between the P1i and M600 respective keyboards. They look very similar, but have a different feel in use. The keys of the P1i are better defined with much cleaner tactile feedback. They have a lighter feel and require less pressure to depress. The overall result is a keyboard which is more comfortable to use and which requires less precision and therefore generates less incorrect key stokes.

The intelligent predictive text software, provided by Zi Corporation and as found on Sony Ericsson’s other UIQ 3 phones, is a welcome presence. During typing, suggestions are displayed across the top of the screen – you can accept the current suggestion by pressing the return key or scroll through the other suggestions using the arrows keys that flank the spacebar key. The improved speed of the QWERTY keyboard makes this less significant than before, but it does offer a further refinement and speed boost for those willing to take advantage of it. 

Compared to the P990, the P1i’s keyboard is a revelation – it is less fiddly to use and, although it does take a little longer to get accustomed to the keyboard’s operation, this is amply rewarded by higher input speeds. This, together with the absence of a flip and some software tweaks, makes the P1i much more usable as a one handed device. For those who prefer pen input, the P1i includes the same handwriting recognition as its predecessors and it is possible to achieve reasonable speeds once you become familiar with the system. The dual system may seem like overkill, but it is more of mark of the P1i’s flexibility. Though I imagine the majority of text input will be carried out using the hardware keys, some text input tasks, such as making corrections or highlighting text for copying and pasting, are easier to carry out using the stylus. The predictive text software is also easier to use in handwriting mode and provides a speed boost of around 10% during longer text entry.

P1i vs E61

 

Memory and Connectivity

The P1i has 160MB of internal flash memory (up from 60MB in the P990) which gives plenty of space for applications and basic contact and PIM data. Multimedia files will be best stored on a memory card using the P1i’s M2 (Memory Stick Micro) card slot, which supports card sizes of up to 4GB.

With Wi-Fi, WCDMA and GPRS, the P1i has a good range of connectivity options. Internet (data) accounts can be set up using any connection bearer and any access point can be included in a group. Improved from earlier UIQ 3 phones is the Settings Wizard, which now automatically recognises when a new SIM card has been inserted and offers the user the opportunity to download the appropriate data settings for internet and MMS usage.

A group consists of a prioritized list of internet accounts and can be used as the default internet account by many applications (effectively allowing multiple access points to be used without changing applications settings). Wi-Fi usage is straightforward with a simple scan and connect applet, accessible from the P1i’s drop down system menu or via Control panel. Internet accounts can be created for regularly used Wi-Fi access points and included in groups.  Moreover, the special 'Default WiFi' internet account (which represents any current Wi-Fi connection) also allows one off Wi-Fi connections (e.g. at an airport) to be used within groups. This functionality, together with groups, means that the P1i will switch seamlessly between using Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity, offering cost savings and easier access to faster Wi-Fi connectivity.

Unfortunately, the P1i supports neither EDGE nor HSDPA (3.5G) data connections. The lack of EDGE is a concern for US users, who are also unable to use the WCDMA connectivity since the phone supports only European 3G bands. HSDPA is becoming more commonplace in high end phones and is supported by a large number of operators. Given the P1i’s rich application capabilities it is a shame that HSDPA connectivity, with its faster download speeds, is missing.

Camera

The P1i has a 3.2 megapixel auto-focus camera which is a small improvement compared to the P990i. The camera software is based on the same UI found in Sony’s Cybershot digital cameras and as such stands out as a little different from the rest of the phone. The interface can be overwhelming at first and the number of options and layout can be a bit unwieldy, but this is significantly improved by use of keypad (1-9) shortcuts, which are well worth learning.  As with all camera phones, performance varies depending on conditions. Some photos can be a little grainy, especially in lower light conditions, but general point and click performance is good. Improved results can be obtained if the numerous settings are fully utilized.

P1i vs E61

The usual white balance, night mode, self timer and digital zoom modes are all present. The digital zoom mode is more useful that on other phones since it sensibly shrinks down the resolution (effectively cropping a larger photo) as you zoom rather than artificially maintaining high resolutions. Thanks to a dual LED flash, the P1i performs better in low light conditions compared to those phones with a single LED flash, although the illumination distance is still relatively limited. Video performance is average, with a maximum resolution of 320 x 240 at 15 frames per second. In general, camera performance is good, though it does not measure up to phones like the Nokia N95 or Sony Ericsson’s own high end Cybershot phones, such as the K850, which have better optics. Still, the camera should be good enough for the majority of users and, given the cost of improved optics and additional megapixels, it is a good compromise between performance and price.

Sample Images from the Camera (click through for full resolution):

P1i sample photo  P1i sample photo

P1i sample photo  P1i sample photo

P1i sample photo  P1i sample photo

 

Other design touches

There are a number of smaller touches that reflect the thought that has gone into the P1i’s design. An example of this is the LED powered light strip on one side of the connector port on the base of the phone. This illuminates during charging, but will also flash when there are unacknowledged new messages (email or SMS) waiting for you.

left side  left side 

On the downside, the P1i uses Sony Ericsson’s proprietary connection port. The lack of a 3.5mm audio jack stifles the multimedia abilities of the phone. While USB charging is a welcome feature, the use of a proprietary cable lessens its usefulness.

In the retail box there is the usual USB cable, charger and headset, but there is also a desktop stand. You can connect the USB cable to this stand and it will also charge the phone if you have USB charging enabled on the phone. The benefit of this is you can effectively have two charging points for the phone out of the box. The stand also makes PC connectivity a breeze and gives a good home station for your phone. There is also a slip case for the phone, providing protection against day to day scratches. These extras reflect the excellent overall value of the P1i. The initial pricing is competitive, the onboard software bundle is good and the hardware extras are a nice touch. This is further extended in certain markets with additional extras in the box  – some European countries will get a Bluetooth GPS and a year's subscription to Wayfinder (navigation software) while some Asian countries include a software voucher (with a rough value of $100).

Conclusion

The P series of phones from Sony Ericsson has traditionally been the most effective true marriage of traditional PDA and phone into a single device. The hardware design on the P1i continues that trend. The smaller size makes the device much more pocketable, while the improved keyboard, especially in light of its size, provides one of the best data entry experiences available. The combination of touchscreen and one handed usage, together with the UIQ software platform, does means there is a necessary learning curve, but it consequently also gives the P1i a great deal of flexibility.

There is room for hardware improvements; Sony Ericsson risk being left behind by not including HSDPA and EDGE connectivity, the use of proprietary connectors is old fashioned and those with larger hands may find the keyboard frustrating.

The temptation of adding new features to high end phones can be difficult to resist, but such new features take time to mature and can add an unnecessary level of complexity for the majority of users. Sony Ericsson have clearly looked at what their core users need from the phone and built the P1i to meet these specifications. As a result the P1i is not as cutting edge as some of its predecessors, but it is a more mature, stable piece of hardware. The design represents a significant improvement over its predecessors for the majority of users. The reduction in size, build quality, materials used and keyboard are particular highlights. While it may not excite those who want to see cutting edge technologies included (who might be well advised to wait patiently for future releases), the P1i is an extremely capable phone which offers an excellent real world usage experience.

Rafe Blandford, All About Symbian, 14 August 2007


The Sony Ericsson P1i is widely available in web stores, such as Clove Technology, and will be available with select operators in due course. 

P1i vs E61

Review Discussion

50 Comments / Post New Comment

krisse
"Sample Images from the Camera (click through for full resolution):"

Holy cow Rafe, what do you get up to at weekends? :)

Most of my sample photos are rather duller!
Rafe
Well it was an unusual weekend... (and a few other days too). Some of them are from Loseley Battle Proms. Of course there had to be an obligatory cat and/or dog photo too.
DevilsRejection
req: pics of stand
krisse
Got to say though, this does look much more professional and attractive than previous P series UIQ phones, at least in my opinion.

The keyboard still looks a bit strange, but it does seem to work by all accounts, so it's just something to get used to.
Unregistered
Hello Rafe,

I was just wondering if you noticed a green tint on the right hand (usually lower part) of your photos. This seems to be a phenomenon with the first batch of P1i's and could be a CMOS defect since the green tinge shows up on the LCD preview also (hopefully it's not a hardware issue.). I have also confirmed this in my posts in Esato. I think I even see it a bit in you photos (though yours isn't as obvious). What do you think?

Sincerely,

Isaac Liao
bluejacker
I've got a Nokia E61 at the moment and a feature I use a lot is VoIP. How does the P1i handle this? Does it work out of the box without problems, or is 3rd Party software necessary? This is what I've been reading up till now. If it's right, then I can forget the P1i right away.
Rafe
I can't say I've noticed a particular green tinge myself. I can't see anything obvious in my photos (sometimes you can convince youself something isn't there and vice versa).

As I said the camera isn't amazing, but this is all relative, much better than the P800 (no suprise) and a bit better than the P990.
Unregistered
Maybe you could take a picture of a white piece of paper? Should be pretty obvious then. Now I have to work out a way to convince myself my n95 has more free ram ;)
Smythe
Hi Guys/Gals, Not too sure why people give this phone good reviews, I bought it but im definatly returning it after just a day. For the following reasons
* Its virtually identical to my M600i in terms of performance. Admitedly the build quality is alot better but its just an M600i with a camera and Wi-FI. and screen *slighly* brighter. Not entirely sure why its always compared to the old P series phones (good marketing on Sony ericssons part I guess). Because its an M610... well It should be called that anyway.
* Phone reception wasnt great. i know this is very subjective, but my N95 always has more bars and sounds better when used in the same locations
* the fonts on UIQ!!!!! When are we goung to get cleartype fonts?!?! S60 definately rules in this department...
* UIQ themes make symbian look like a Toy OS ;-) way too colourful and cartoon like... even the plain ones are coloutful.

Just my 2p...
dwinokur
Hi Rafe, could you talk a little bit about the quality of the camera, particularly as compared to other phones with 3.2 mPix or higher? Specifically, I'm curious about comparing the quality of this camera to the k810 and k800, as well as the N73 and N95.

Thanks!
Guess Who
SE should send free P1s for the ripped-off full price lemon P990 buyers. Anyways the P1 is the same obsolete 2005-2006 technology (what about HSDPA? quadband? 16M color TFT? 300+MHz CPU? etc.), just more RAM.
Guess Who
Btw still no call recording or any profile system. Is this a business phone?
JDesigner
Smythe,

As far as reception on N95 better than P1i - an explanation of cell reception copied from mobiledia

"Ever wonder why you don't get reception? For a simple answer, typically user load and tower placement are the reasons reception quality diminishes. Other factors may be terrain, modulation technology, weather, or the phone itself. However, call quality depends more upon network than anything else."

JDesigner
Rafe
Quote:
Hi Guys/Gals, Not too sure why people give this phone good reviews, I bought it but im definatly returning it after just a day. For the following reasons
* Its virtually identical to my M600i in terms of performance. Admitedly the build quality is alot better but its just an M600i with a camera and Wi-FI. and screen *slighly* brighter. Not entirely sure why its always compared to the old P series phones (good marketing on Sony ericssons part I guess). Because its an M610... well It should be called that anyway.
* Phone reception wasnt great. i know this is very subjective, but my N95 always has more bars and sounds better when used in the same locations
* the fonts on UIQ!!!!! When are we goung to get cleartype fonts?!?! S60 definately rules in this department...
* UIQ themes make symbian look like a Toy OS ;-) way too colourful and cartoon like... even the plain ones are coloutful.

Just my 2p...
Actually I found the performance to be better than a M600. I'll discuss this more in part2, but side by side its noticeably faster. I do see you point about M / P series, but then I always felt the M600 was really a different type of P series device.

Phone reception has been good for me. Indeed it got a signal in one place where usually I don't get one or have a low signal. You;re not alone though. I'll try and test this some more.

There are some nice themes from UIQ.com - like you I prefer my themes basic, but not a lot of people seem to agree.

Quote:
Hi Rafe, could you talk a little bit about the quality of the camera, particularly as compared to other phones with 3.2 mPix or higher? Specifically, I'm curious about comparing the quality of this camera to the k810 and k800, as well as the N73 and N95.

Thanks!
This sort of thing is always a bit subjective. I'm not sure it measures up to the K810 though I dont have one to do a direct comparison with. I would say its simialr to the N73 in most situations (N73 maybe better in medium light). Its not as good as the N95. I included some sample photos so people could see for themselves. If there interest I can probably do some more.

Quote:
SE should send free P1s for the ripped-off full price lemon P990 buyers. Anyways the P1 is the same obsolete 2005-2006 technology (what about HSDPA? quadband? 16M color TFT? 300+MHz CPU? etc.), just more RAM.
I think that a matter of perspective. As I noted in the review it is not cutting edge, but I do think it is mature as a platform. This is what a lot of people want. They want stability and the tried and tested stuff. I think this is also reflected in the pricing - which is very competitive and will grow more so in time. Still I would suggest this might not be the phone for the person who wants the very latest thing. Wait a bit longer for that.

Quote:
Btw still no call recording or any profile system. Is this a business phone?
True, its just the silence option. Call recording can be added by 3rd party software I believe.

Interestingly I think these comments demonstrate how hard it is to keep everyone happy. All phones make compromises in some ways. It depends how much they impact you personally as to what you think of said phone.
JDesigner
I wonder how many people are using this phone on the T-Mobile network? Many of the websites mention T-Mobile as the site for unlocked phones. Maybe the performance is better on AT&T.
Richard Ross
I disagree with the idea that the P1i is very similar to the m600 in performance terms - I've been playing with one for two days and it is MUCH faster than my M600. Screen is vastly superior too.

It is also of a far higher build quality and the kinks in the keyboard have almost all been ironed out - I'm getting the same sort of words-per-minute out of it as I do on my Blackberry.

SE have obviously decided to abandon the 'kitchen sink' approach taken with previous P-series phones and heavy Web users will have to think long and hard about how much they need g and HSDPA before buying. For the average user, the options available will be more than adequate even for downloading attachments.

My view is that, right now, if you are not interested in creating or editing large documents through your phone, then the P1i is a terrific option - certainly a step up from current Blackberrys, Moto's Q and Nokia's E61.

I think the P1 really reflects SE's decision to create a 'mass market' smartphone rather than trying to build something for the early-adopter/power user market. Nothing wrong with that providing you know what you are getting.

The UIQ interface is quite cartoon-like but I enjoy that. Some won't.

Finally, the idea that this is not a 'business phone' is a nonsense. I'm not important at all but I work for guys leading massive multi-nationals and you know what most of them use? Moto Razr's and numbered Nokias combined with Blackberry's they shove in their briefcases. Why? because they have neither the time nor the patience to devote to mucking about with smartphones! It's all about getting what you, the individual user, wants.

The lack of profiles on the P1 is a major irritant, as is the occassional need to reach for the stylus to hit a small icon. Otherwise, though, it's a top device if it's technology covers your needs.
Smythe
More rants...

*When using UIQ, you cant simply use the jog dial to control everything. you have to resort to using a mixture of the jogdial, keyboard, stylus and your finger on the screen! surely even PalmOS sussed the the D-pad and touchscreen functionality with the first TREO650! i.e. you can completely control the device using *either* the dpad, *OR* the touch screen. we are in 2007 now grrr! ;-)
* have also had a play with windows mobile 5.0 Smartphone edition (i used to own a Samsung i320). Its miles better than UIQ. looks better (fonts, themes, etc). The fonts on that baby are just beautiful.
* Like I said... I believe S60 is way superior to UIQ... Those UIQ guys need to shape up because it has so much potential. just add good D-Pad *and* touchscreen support. Dont force users to make a choice... (like the moto z8) just have a device that does both well.

Maybe im just a demanding user... but hey... PalmOS had all this stuff years ago (even good fonts).... but the Palm problems are another story... ;-)
happysailor
Hi Rafe

I have P910i; I don't know how big its screen actually is in pixels, but I see SE describes the 990 (same screen as 910i?) as being 262,144 & 240x320. They describe the P1 screen as the same, but it looks as though the P990 / 910i screens must be at least 15-20% larger with flip open. Are they larger? If so, does the p1 screen feel like a step backwards?
Richard Ross
:)

Have to disagree with you about almost everything there!

- Almost everything can be controlled by the scroll wheel and finger-presses on screen. When you do have to reach for a stylus it's annoying but it's actually rather rare for all major actions (launching apps, calling, cahinging options etc). Of course you have to involve the keyboard if you are entering text or data.

Honestly, while not the most intuitive interface UIQ3 is far from the mess many seem to think it is: it does take more time to learn than S60, though.

- I've used Windows Mobile 5 for a year on an HTC TyTn and while the look of it is clearly subjective the idea that it's inherently easier to get to grips with than UIQ is, with respect, rubbish. It's not a bad OS at all but it has many of its own ticks, quirks and counter intuitive burying of key items. The fonts are fine but not a utility improvement on UIQ, just different.

WM on the TyTn is also not as stable as UIQ on my M600 and the inbuilt calendar and task apps are poor and don't fit with the rest of the device (tasks on the front screen? a calendar that knows the difference betwen an app and a reminder?) - in fact there are a liot of areas in WM where the various parts do not gel well.

I used it and once I got used to it, it was fine but it's not actually significantly better than UIQ.

Where we do agree is on S60: it's easily the best mobile OS around, balancing utility with aesthetic appeal and a low and easy learning curve. Someone needs to do a better job on E90 support but otherwise, its the current gold standard by a mile.

UIQ has a lot going for it but lacks in some areas and isn't intuitive. SE's move, with the P1i, to turn its touchscreen support into a finger-control option rather than requiring the stylus could well signal the way to make it a genuine contender.


Now, if only Palm would stop acting like a company that wants to commit suicide, we might really have a true S60 competitor out there!
Smythe
Richard,

lol! Robust response... ;-) But I have to "Counter" disagree ;-)

* By saying you can use "the scroll wheel *and* finger presses on the screen", you make my point precisely... ;-) you should just be able to use the scroll wheel *and maybe* the keyboard (soft keys) in isolation of everything else... The fact that there are no softkeys.. (even the top 1,2,3 number dial buttons could have doubled as softkeys... or something).. it quite ridiculous... There is even space on the device for softkeys... just below the screen. but its just bare wasted space. not everyone likes to poke thier screens just to click "more". And some buttons like the "easy access" dropdown on the top left are not that "easily accesible" with a thumb because its extremely small. Just put a D-Pad and softeys on the damn thing!... IMHO ;-)

* Im not referring to Windows mobile 5 with the touch screen... I hear it can be hit/miss depending on what hardware you are running it on.I was referring to Windows mobile 5 "Smartphone" edition. (the one that doesnt allow for a touch screen). the implementation on the Samsung i320 is VERY good, extremely stable and looks beautiful... I dont even think there has been a rom update since they released it. I cant comment on the other windows mobile 5 devices though.

* Yeah I agree with you Palm swallowed a suicide pill along time ago lol. The Treo650 was ground breaking in its time... but I think theyve been taking too many bong hits since then. Not including 3G and/or alternatively WI-FI on their PalmOS phones (in the UK) in 2007 is absolutely crazy! Also.... theyve flogged the treo form factor to death I think... Its almost twice the thickness of the Blackjack. The PalmOS is not even trully multi treaded!!!!!!!!! Remember we are in 2007 where full blown UMPCs are not incredibley larger!!!!!!!

* Imagine a multithreaded PalmOS variant and running on a device the form-factor of the Samsung i320/i600 (blackjack) or Blackberry Curve with 3G and/or WI-FI (Yup im definately old-school ;-))... now that would make me drool... yum. ;-~)
Rafe
I had exactly the same thought about softkeys and room for them on the chasis when the M600i came out. However it soon becomes second nature to just tap the screen and you really don't notice they're not there. The position of the arrow keys (left / right - going through tabbed dialogs) does annoy me a bit, but this is fairly uncommon in the interface.

That said I do wonder about the thinking behind leaving a D-Pad off. There's merits both ways. UIQ works very well with one of these as Z8 users will know.
Smythe
I agree maybe we will begin to see better devices with UIQ3.1 now in the wild... i.e. with both good (consistent) D-Pad and Touch screen support.
Unregistered
Hello,

I guess you are lucky Rafe becasue most of the people at Esato forums that have the P1i have a green tinge on the lower right hand side of their photos. This indicates to me that perhaps the cmos is defective for that particular batch. It's unlikely that it's a firmware issue, otherwise everyone would be having the same problem. Additonally the fact that the green tinge comes up int he LCD preview gives creedence to the idea that it's a CMOS problem. The only other possibility is that the lens coating has some issues. What do you think?
Rafe
Yeah, these things can happen. I've had another look and can't convince myself anything is there so maybe I got lucky (or maybe I am less observant)!
Salgueiro
Can you tel me about P1i camera speed?
Especifically the shutter speed (lag)!
Thank´s

50 Comments / Post New Comment

Copyright Notes || Contact Us || Privacy Policy