Review: Nokia C6 Part 1: First Impressions and Hardware

Published by David Gilson at 11:45 UTC, August 5th 2010

Summary:

David Gilson takes on Nokia's latest touchscreen hybrid smartphone, the C6-00, looking in this first review part at the raw hardware - how does the C6 stack up against the hardware in the 5800 and N97 mini, between which it seems to represent a middle ground? From overall styling and shape to keyboard ergonomics, David leaves no stone unturned... Future review parts will look at the C6's camera, multimedia and general applications and performance.

Author: Nokia
Version Reviewed: 10.0.021

Introduction

The Nokia C6-00 is the first hybrid form factor in Nokia's new Cseries range. The Cseries fits in with Nokia's plan to 'democratise' the smartphone market by providing the majority of flagship device functionality at a budget price. Clearly, the C6 will mostly be compared against the N97 mini. Over the forthcoming parts of this review I'll explore how many compromises have been made to keep costs down with the C6, and how reasonable a price gap there is between it and its premium cousins.

The Nokia C6

The Nokia C6.

Specifications

  • Networks:
    • GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
    • HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100
    • WLAN IEEE 802.11 B/G
    • Bluetooth 2.0 with EDR
  • Operating System: S60 5th Edition (also now known as Symbian^1)
  • Storage:
    • RAM: 123.71MB (48MB available at cold start)
    • Internal drive C: 282.92MB
    • Peripheral storage: Micro SDHC (2GB supplied)
  • Screen:
  • 3.2" TFT
  • Resistive touch layer
  • 640x360 "nHD" Pixels
  • Battery: BP-4J, 1200 mAh
  • Camera:
    • 5 Mega-pixel
    • AutoFocus
    • Single LED Flash
  • Ports:
    • 2mm Charging socket
    • Micro USB high speed data, not charging
    • 3.5mm headphone socket
  • Physical dimensions:
    • Size: 113.4 x 53.0 x 16.8 mm
    • Volume: 80 cc
    • Mass: 150g
  • Navigation:
    • A-GPS
    • There is no digital compass

Design

In its closed form, the C6 is reminiscent of the Nokia 5800. This is due to its rounded corners, screen size, and three physical keys for call, menu and end. The end key doubles as the power key too (and thus profile menu launcher). The front of the C6 is otherwise quite featureless, which makes for a nice clean look. An early sign of the budget components used is with the touch screen. This is noticeably soft, like earlier touch screen phones from Nokia. Also, holding the screen up to the light reveals distorted reflections, demonstrating that the surface is not perfectly flat. This isn't necessarily due to the resistive technology being used, as I have reviewed the Vivaz Pro, whose resistive touch screen was firm, almost feeling like a capacitive touch screen. Having said all that, the C6's touch screen is perfectly responsive and accurate in everyday use.

The Nokia C6 - Closed

The Nokia C6 - Closed.

The size and shape of the C6 are my main complaints with its design. While it is a good looking device, it doesn't feel good to hold. The rear is so prominently curved, and it is fairly narrow, that it can be tricky to get a firm grip for one-handed operation. It can often be the proverbial slippery bar of soap, and I've already dropped the C6 more times than I'd care to mention (fortunately, only a few inches to my desk!). This problem continues into sliding the screen aside to access the keyboard. The screen section constitutes the only flat area of the C6's side, and so there is only the sloped rear section to press against when sliding the screen. There is a definite learning process to know how to apply sufficient pressure to the curved rear side so that the screen will move, without the whole phone popping out of one's hands.

Curved edges of the Nokia C6

Note the wide curvature around the back of the C6.

On the subject of the sliding screen, its action is firm and satisfying. The only sign of a budget mechanism is when the C6 is viewed side-on, where a clear millimetre gap is visible between the two sections. Again, this has no effect on everyday use, and there is absolutely no compressional movement between the two sections.

The base of the C6 is a clean design, with the microphone and lanyard holes clustered together at one corner. Adjacent to those is the 2mm charging socket, which has a little surprise. The plastic sleeve around the socket illuminates via a white LED, to indicate charging. It is a constant light, and so has no way to indicate that the C6's battery is fully charged though.

The Nokia C6 base

The C6's base, with illuminated charging port.

The top of the C6 is similarly sparse, just having the 3.5mm headphone socket and a covered microUSB socket. As mentioned above, the end key doubles as the power key, which means one less button on top! The port cover works fairly well and is similar to that found on the E72; although I would have preferred a cover that could have rotated out of the way. Another point of criticism to make is that the USB port is for data only, it will not charge the battery. This is a real backwards step and is probably one of the budgetary compromises of the C6. If you want to transfer files and charge the C6 at the same time, you have to have wires coming out of the top and bottom of the phone. It would have been preferable to have had data and charging sockets adjacent to each other, if they had to have mutually exclusive functions.

Nokia C6 top

The C6's top - featuring a 3.5mm heaphone socket and covered microUSB port (which doesn't charge the battery).

The right side of the C6 has the usual complement of volume keys, screen lock slider, and camera shutter button. The buttons certainly have a no-frills feel to them, particularly so because they are narrow pieces of plastic with uncomfortably sharp corners. However, this is partly due, again, to the curvature of the C6's back. The degree of curvature leaves little area to fit in button slots, which makes them necessarily narrow and thus uncomfortable. Despite this, it should be said that the two-stage action on the camera button works well and provides enough tactile feedback. The left side of the C6 is pleasingly blank, with just a discrete cover for the microSDHC card slot.

The Nokia C6 right side

Right side - Two stage camera button, screen lock slider, and volume keys.

The Nokia C6 left side

Left side - Just the microSDHC card slot cover.

The back of the C6 is dominated by the matt plastic battery cover, which features cut-outs for the camera, LED light, and speaker. With the C6's budget nature in mind, I wasn't expecting much of its speaker, but I was pleasantly surprised. It has enough volume to fill a small room, and there is only a very slight distortion with high frequencies, perfectly acceptable for everyday use. The battery cover stays firmly in place, and it is held on by a plastic catch, which again reflects on the budget materials. The cover doesn't spring open when the catch is pressed, so one has to hold the catch back, and at the same time lever the cover off with a finger nail.

The Nokia C6 rear side

The rear of the C6, including a metal back plate as part of the sliding mechanism.

There is no camera cover on the C6. The camera glass is slightly recessed to avoid excessive scratching. However, it isn't recessed enough to avoid picking up grease from your hand during normal phone use. On the bright side, the lack of a cover means the LED is available to use as a torch (e.g. using PhoneTorch or Bright Light Touch). We'll be returning to look at camera performance in a later part of our review.

The Nokia C6 camera

The C6's 5 megapixel camera. Note the lacquered effect bezel.

Battery Life

Beneath the battery cover is the SIM card slot and the 1200mAh BP-4J battery. It is not surprising that the battery life isn't stellar on the C6. Especially considering many Eseries devices last for days with a 1500mAh battery and only a 2.4" screen to illuminate. While the likes of the N97 mini and C6 have a much larger screen to run, but with 20% less battery capacity. For simple phone duties, the C6 will last a day. Mind you, trying to maintain a data connection, or do anything that will drive the screen for a long time, will quickly exhaust the BP-4J battery.

The Nokia C6 battery

The Nokia C6's battery

Keyboard

When the C6's screen is slid aside, the full QWERTY keyboard is revealed. I expect that most people will be pleased with this keyboard. The C6 sports a d-pad, rather than cursor keys. However, the d-pad has a bowl-like design that is comfortable in one or two handed operation, and is not a problem to reach over while typing. One unfortunate aspect is that the d-pad's select button is vertically aligned with, and adjacent to the delete key. This can potentially lead to a literal faux pas; e.g. causing a message to be sent prematurely. This problem was completely avoidable by simply leaving some space between the d-pad and the keyboard, there is plenty of empty space on the right-hand side of the d-pad for it to have been moved a few millimetres.

The Nokia C6 D-pad

The Nokia C6 d-pad. Very comfortable to use, but the select key is too close to the delete key.

The keyboard is sensibly set out, with modifier keys grouped together on the left-side of the bottom row. In comparison to other QWERTY keyboards, the C6 caters for more popular symbols by not requiring a modifier key, e.g. for '@', the apostrophe, and question mark. Another good difference between the C6 and N97 mini keyboard is that there are four rows, rather than the mini's three rows (see my editorial on keyboard geometries). However, the C6 keys are softer than those found on the N97 mini. It's subjective as to how this affects individuals, but it's worth being aware of when choosing which phone to buy. Another subjective point is the placement of the space-bar, which is still off-centre, as with the N97 and N97 mini. This is a design decision which may have as many fans as critics, although it is interesting to note that from the N97 to the N97 mini, and now to the C6, that the space bar seems to be drifting towards centre with each iteration.

The QWERTY keyboard of the Nokia C6

The QWERTY keyboard of the Nokia C6 - set out well and comfortable to use.

Software first impressions

Later instalments of this review will look at all of the C6's software in greater detail. However, to give a a brief overview, it would be fair to say that anyone familiar with the the N97 or N97 mini will be at home with the C6. To start with, there is the same widget-based home screen, the standard Symbian PIM applications, and Quickoffice viewers for MS Office files and PDF files. A notable addition is the Nokia Messaging e-mail client, as seen in S60 3rd Edition Feature Pack 2 Eseries phones, a very welcome addition. The C6 also comes with Ovi Maps 3.3, not the latest version, but recent enough for free navigation.

The Nokia C6 home screen widgets

The Nokia C6 sporting the N97-style home screen widgets.

All About Symbian's first impressions of the C6 are that it is a rather nippy and responsive device, although this is something that will be examined in more detail for the next part of the the review.

All of the photos in this review were taken by Rafe, and you can see more in his photo review of the C6.

David Gilson for All About Symbian, 9th August 2010.

 

Buy Link


 

Filed: Home > Reviews > Nokia C6 Part 1: First Impressions and Hardware

Platforms: S60 5th Edition

Categories: Hardware

Review Discussion

comnut
before all the devs, programmers and other 'portable PC' people get going, please may I ask a few simple questions for those of us who *only* want to use this device for PDA, internet , quick camera , and EVEN want to use it as a mobile phone???? :o

Many say it is 'just the same as the 5800 /n97 - most specs say it has more memory (the stuff used for storing data while loading an Internet page, I mean, not 'storage'..)
Can you please verify if this actually has more than the n97 or 5800? (both RAM and storage..)

there are also no pics available of how good the camera is in low light (quiet restaurant, etc) - is it still as bad as the 5800??

thanks in advance... please reply!:icon14:
Unregistered
So many mistakes in the specs. Seriously, this is All About Symbian for gods sake. Are you busy using your Androids and iPads (thats you steve)
davidgilson
Quote:
Originally Posted by comnut View Post
before all the devs, programmers and other 'portable PC' people get going, please may I ask a few simple questions for those of us who *only* want to use this device for PDA, internet , quick camera , and EVEN want to use it as a mobile phone???? :o

Many say it is 'just the same as the 5800 /n97 - most specs say it has more memory (the stuff used for storing data while loading an Internet page, I mean, not 'storage'..)
Can you please verify if this actually has more than the n97 or 5800? (both RAM and storage..)

there are also no pics available of how good the camera is in low light (quiet restaurant, etc) - is it still as bad as the 5800??

thanks in advance... please reply!:icon14:
Just sit tight :) These are the sort of questions that will be covered in the next part of the review!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
So many mistakes in the specs. Seriously, this is All About Symbian for gods sake. Are you busy using your Androids and iPads (thats you steve)
You'll actually have to state what you think is in error, and registering wouldn't hurt either ;-)
dj...
David,

Not about the phone at all but I just thought to add that really I liked your writing. really clear and to the point. Pics are excellent too.

I like the look of the phone too. not to replace my n97, transflective screen is key for me, but I like the keyboard and am obviously a "hybrid" (wierd term) fan.

have fun,
dj
davidgilson
Nope, 128g and 3rd was an error - corrected. C6 is Symbian^1/5th Edition and 150g, sorry about that. All other data is the same as found on Nokia's C6 data sheet.
filipp
"Another subjective point is the placement of the space-bar, which is still off-centre" [...] "space bar seems to be drifting towards centre with each iteration."

Here's my suggestion to Nokia keyboard designers - move Sym key next to the right Shift, then move spacebar and surrounding keys one place to the left. Spcebar goes closer to the center, Sym key can be used with all keys, no conflict with "C" key.
user47alpha
Will this be Nokias last variation of the hardware platform introduced with the 5800XM? I really hope so, despite the fact that I like my 5800, it's hard to defend why a 2010-smartphone loses energy while connected via USB.
Another thing is the "embedded" screen, you know, the thing with the dirtcatching beezel...

Is it true that the C6 only has A-GPS?
davidgilson
Quote:
Originally Posted by user47alpha View Post
...Is it true that the C6 only has A-GPS?
Depends if you're asking about hardware or software.

Hardware, yes it's only AGPS, there isn't a compass. I was surprised at this, so double checked. Tried auto-rotation in Ovi Maps, and I installed one of the free compass apps from the Ovi Store. No rotational response.

However, in application settings, the C6 does have the same WiFi positioning option found in other recent models.
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by user47alpha View Post
W.
Another thing is the "embedded" screen, you know, the thing with the dirtcatching beezel...

?
I believe that design is to keep the resistive (easily scratched) screen clear of surfaces when the handset is placed face down, and to provide an edge-stop for stylus users.
krizanand
To err is human, but is it a right gesture to delete the post which pointed out that error. Didn't expect this from AAS.
Biggles
Quote:
Originally Posted by user47alpha View Post
Will this be Nokias last variation of the hardware
Is it true that the C6 only has A-GPS?
Not sure if this is what you meant, but A-GPS does NOT mean there is no real GPS. Assisted GPS still has a real GPS chip, but it uses network methods such as cell IDs and wi-fi to get location faster (albeit slightly less accurate).

In other words, A-GPS is better than GPS.
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by krizanand View Post
To err is human, but is it a right gesture to delete the post which pointed out that error. Didn't expect this from AAS.
Does it really matter?
comnut
davidgilson; Thanks!

for others quoting the 'nokia datasheet' - it still only says '200 M internal' - Unlike the spec for 5800, that at least says '81 M storage, 128 M ram' ...

I find the AGPS fine here in UK, as well as the resistive screen.. I would rather not get frostbite, just by using the screen... :)

and for those moaning about the accuracy/ quality of various things, if you want it done properly get a proper camera or gps unit!!! :D:D
DardoCH
I understand this being a budget phone and all and I do see the value this phone proposes to millions who don't have the money to go upper scale but still want a powerful smartphone. It does offer great value for the buck. The digital compass is not a feature to cry about, walk navigation works fine without it. People do need to understand this is a smartphone that can do just about as much as any smartphone out there with free navigation for €220.- contract free!!! The navigation alone is worth about €100.- and spares you from getting a separate stand alone unit. And I do think everyone should have a navigation device who drives or travels-which is just about everyone because if you don't drive then you travel and if you dont do either then you really shouldn't get a smartphone lol

However, I still think this phone would have been better off 2cm shorter meaning the whole D-pad is really not needed here at all, the N97 mini doesn't have it so why would this need one? It would have saved Nokia money in materials and people space in the pocket. I'm not sure why they did that but i have a feeling they may have used the left overs from the N97 classic but that had the d-pad on the other side. So Nokia is really dumb sometimes because they really are a confused company, sometimes they do a strange 3 row keyboard with space bar hidden somewhere on the right with d-pad on the left, then they go and release a 4 row keyboard with space bar somewhat in the middle but the d-pad on the right. They're a really really confused company and I think they need to lose an other 10% on top of the 20% they've lost until now in marketshare for them to wake up and feel the heat. Otherwise they're in good shape.
user47alpha
Maybe my understanding of AGPS is wrong. I thought AGPS is just the method of getting your position through triangulating cell towers (or something like that). In my eyes there is no GPS-chip needed to fullfil this task so I thought only AGPS = no GPS-chip.

But if it means AGPS = GPS + A... then I am fine ;)
slitchfield
Yes, Assisted GPS is GPS *plus* Internet-and-cell-tower-derived info on where the satellites are today, so locking on becomes a lot faster.

re: the deleted post... eh? I can still see the post which pointed out the spec error. The only thing I've zapped today was a spammer....
hdx
Please correct the article, the charging socket light on my C6 DOES go off when the charging is complete. So it can be a perfect charging indicator without having to unlock the screen just to see the charging status.
andynugent
Quote:
Originally Posted by comnut View Post
for others quoting the 'nokia datasheet' - it still only says '200 M internal' - Unlike the spec for 5800, that at least says '81 M storage, 128 M ram' ...
Forum Nokia spec has it as 128MB RAM and 512MB storage (C: & Z: drives) with 240MB on C: drive (unless I'm reading it wrong), plus upto 16GB SD cards:

http://www.forum.nokia.com/Devices/D...cations/C6-00/
comnut
You need to research AGPS more... :) correct me if wrong, but....

It is said that a 'satellite only' GPS unit can take quite some time to 'lock on' if the view of the sat is blocked by buildings, trees, etc, so it has to wait for a clear view of it, to get going...

AGPS uses the phone network to get info on sat positions, verified by cell tower positions, and get 'precise time' - it can use this to get a primary fix, until the sat gives a better one..
Unregistered
I thought the C6 was a quad band 3G phone.
talhamid
This is fun. Let's do a Nokia reviews vs Android reviews comparison in terms of what is the most important consideration in reviews of both. Though this is intended as a jab at Nokia, there are some surprises there!

1) OS. Nokia: Do the widgets at last work properly on the two year old OS which will never be upgradeable to something better?
Android: When is it getting Android 2.2 and 3.0 (timeline being months not years)

2) Form factor.
Nokia: Oh, space bar, where art thou this time.
Android: Is the default prediction on on-screen keyboard OK or could it use any of the 20 other keyboards available?

3) Memory
Nokia: Can the RAM handle more than 5 apps open?
Android: RAM being always more than 350 MB, ceases to be an issue.

Nokia: What is the internal memory? Can it handle web cache of two browsing sessions?
Android: Oh, it is not sufficient to install more than 50 apps! (though fixed now through ability to install apps to card)

4) Processor:

Nokia: 434 MHz! So much lovelier than mere 400 MHz!
ANdroid: Who even cares? The phone is fast anyway.

5) Interface
Nokia: Three home screens! (oh no, that's Symbian^3). Widgets that work!
Android: More home screens than anyone really needs. Also, widgets that are FUNCTIONAL, INTERACTIVE and JUST WORK with or without constant data connection.

6) Menu structure
Nokia: Oh no, they changed the folders again
Android: All of my apps are on homescreen. What's it like to be in a menu?

7) Usability
Nokia: All menus have kinetic scrolling except contacts. Hope they fix it in a future update
Android: Just put the finger there and flick - is there any other way to scroll?

Nokia: Ovi store is good but only has 5 apps for this model and those too are available between 3 am and 5 am only. Too bad Nokia did not enable more for this particular version of a two year old OS.
Android: Now, would you like an app for that or a custom ROM for that?

Search:
Nokia: Search has improved - now only takes ten seconds. Voice dialing is faster though
Android: Sorry - connect to google first for anything search related. Offline is no go.

Messaging:
Nokia: Look, we have a conversation view!!!! No, not on THIS set, that'll be Symbian ^3, yours for only 500 quid.
Android:
Is there any other way to display messages?



8) Battery life
Nokia: Too bad, doesn't last more than 2 days
Android: Too good, lasts for 6 whole hours!


9) Price
Nokia: Excellent phone for the mass market
Android: Mass market? What's that?
davidgilson
Quote:
Originally Posted by hdx View Post
Please correct the article, the charging socket light on my C6 DOES go off when the charging is complete. So it can be a perfect charging indicator without having to unlock the screen just to see the charging status.
Thanks for the feedback on this. I can only report on how the review unit I have behaves. The charging light on this one has never gone off, even when I've left it connected over extended periods.
mark.pagett
looks like a great little phone to me im serioulsy considering 1 for my next upgrade, great review looking forward to reading more :)
comnut
talhamid: Please be careful with long posts, as most will just briefly look, and wrongly think you are just another android ranter.... :)

on a closer look, you seem to have your tongue firmly in cheek! :D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue_in_cheek

here is my 'take' ..:P

1) OS. Nokia: widgets? whatever these are, I leave those to the teenagers... my 5800 works fine thank you, and the old age of it means that most bugs have been ironed out!!!

2) Form factor (????) - exactly *HOW* many Mobiles do you have, to forget where the spacebar is?????? no I like one standard kbd thanks..

3) Memory for apps?? I have opera mobile with the BBC website, Notes to copy a URL for this,

musicplayer playing a track, while I am using smartmovie to check a clip, and also using 'xplore' to easily see my pictures, at the same time as using gallery, and also checking my appointments in calendar...

that makes 7 apps all open.... and newer nokias will do better...

4) Processor: numbers game huh?? the newer ones will all go faster, but a GPU will be better.. do you want speed, or battery life???

5) Interface: Only thing needed is a *standard* - let the kids of *all* ages get many fancy screens, its only vanity... a proper phone has (6) & (7) already part of it..

6) Menu structure: you mean that PC thing??? not needed to know about, unless you want a PC...

7) Usability ??? oh you just want kinetic scrolling to make it look fancy....

Ovi store, or ANY company only thing is always crap... do a web search there are plenty of independents, making good software... www.lonelycatgames.com and opera being two major ones...
talhamid
@ comnut: But I AM an android ranter! I switched two months back and have never looked back! :-). I am in no position to forgive Nokia for N97 (biggest and most expensive tech disaster in my life) and N900 (excellent set, stunningly poor support, no landscape fix, no phone). That said, in my post Nokia came out on top in two very important category: battery life and mass market appeal.

ANother long post I guess - I will reply briefly to your points. (1) PROPERLY WORKING widgets on my Android have reduced my trips to menu to approx. 0. And at 32 I am no teenager :-). (2) Thats what Nokia forgets - to make ONE STANDARD keyboard configuration on all its sets. You'd think they started making mobiles yesterday. (3) My N97 curled and died if I opened more than two web pages on it, so did my N900. End of story. Don't care how years old sets multitasked just fine -- it is the last failure that counts. I'd love to know what set you are using though. (4) Speed, thanks very much. Yes I know Android battery life sucks, but I'd rather not have the messaging app take 5 seconds to load and then crash because a web page was open in the background. (5) Symbian (the 'OPEN' OS LOL) can't BEGIN to imagine the level of customization and flexibility offered by Android. Just as an example, I added the ability to trigger profiles and wireless networks at specific times, plus making emails and SMS pop up, unlock my phone, offer a keyboard and reply (all without going into the apps themselves), all via free apps. I know Symbian has all that (big deal, it is five times older) but is it so cheap and easy to use? No. (5) Trust me, with WORKING widgets (as opposed to Nokia's widgets), 7 screens actually help you through daily life. (6) Menu structure is important - thats why Nokia seems to invent a new one with every set! Its good that Android (and Iphone) don't have any. (7) The sad thing is, and I say it sincerely, the BEST paid apps for Symbian cannot match the quality of the BEST FREE apps doing the same thing on Android.

That said, I still have high hopes - AAS remains one of my favorite sites. I don't have much hope in Symbian but I think Meego+Nokia has what it takes.

Full thread: 27 Comments / Post New Comment

Search

Navigation

Social

Advert

Translate