Why can't my S60 phone do that?

[slitchfield]

It's all very well standing there smugly with your new Nokia N or Eseries phone, knowing that it's functionally superior to your friend's Apple iPhone. But when you both turn on your devices, it's the iPhone that people gather round, partly because of the larger screen, but also partly to watch its party tricks. Watching these tricks, you might well ask: 'Why can't my S60 phone do that?' Chances are, it can, with a few software caveats...

Read on in the full article.

[jah]

Well when I get my Xperia X1 with its 800x480 resolution I think the my iPhone owning friends are going to be looking at my new toy

[Kikuyumoja]

Isn't that an iPod?

No, seriously, another advantage is that multimedia files can just be uploaded to the N95 or a swappable media and thus save us from iTunes or any complicated putty sessions. The only thing I really miss on my N95-1 is the better browser experience.

I think what the iPhone managed to achieve is that it generated so much public interest, and this although it's the first time Apple ever created a phone. So even though the iPhone is somewhat crippled compared to the N95-1, it still has a better public image. The question of "see-what-my-N95-can-do-and-your-iPhone-can't" actually never arose for me so far.

the iphone always looks better than n95, It's always about sex appeal.

clearly iPhone is a winner in usability and ease of use, also yeah it is perhaps possible to just drag and drop files which n95 will be able to play and do other thigs, but that's cause we "nerds" know how. an average Joe, doesn't and hence the reason it is very popular cause it is way simpler to get games, get music and get videos of iTunes Store.

It's the intuitive GUI. Less is more and I can do everything what I want/need in a fast and smooth way. It's the only pocket Unix device (os-x, bash, openssh, apache, python...) which can be used seriously.

N810, which I own too and soon on eBay, is crap - even with 800x480. And X1 is ... Windows? So you should be warned.
I would get a Symbian if I only can choose between WM and S60. But anyway, on Symbian touchscreen phones and on Windows Mobile touchscreen phone a stylus is a must-have. That makes me sick after 3 weeks with my new toy, my iPhone.

[lookatbowen]

It is totally pointless comparing the Nokia N95 with the iPhone. I would happily agree that the iPhone wins in the screen size and touch screen department, but hey, size isn't everything! That is it! - Comparison over. The N95 is vastly superior in all other aspects, including the software application. Symbian has tons of software options.

AAS, surely by now you would have to agree that the N95 (even though the original version is more than 18 months old) is still surprising the odd iPhone user. Surely you have to come to the conclusion that there are very few NEW smartphones on the market (including all other Nokia smartphones N85, N96 etc) that can beat the 18 month old phone.

The Samsung 8510 has the potential to beat it if they sort out their software.

[lookatbowen]

Strangely enough Slitchfield, I was standing in a group recently and there was one idiot with an iPhone bragging how good the phone was, showing it off as if it was the greatest thing since sliced toast, until someone asked him where some place was and how quickly he could get home? While he was struggling to get reception, I pulled out my N95 and opened Google Maps, typed in the location and in a few seconds had the answer. iPhone idiot was still pondering why his phone had no reception.... Everyone just laughed at him and he even agreed that my one handed search was way better than his two handed search.... I guess it depends what crowd you are in.

its funny how most ppl r disappointed with there s60 device n complain they can't do what the iphone does and is getting less attention. other than the touch screen part, theres not one thing i can find iphone can do and our s60 can't do better. it is just most users just looked at someone else's iphone n compared directly, which they never borthered to think out of the box or even try to give a wee bit more understanding of their device. sometimes it just makes me feel like its my duty to put that iphone back to shame with my n95.

Nice sentiment but the execution of this article was pretty poor. The pictures didn't help either - showing how great everything looks on that big, beautiful crystal clear display next to the N95's tiny foggy screen.

Also, it's odd that Steve's answer to the iPhone's native functionality in some cases is to spend more money on third-party apps.

Rewrite.

[bluestar]

Well I am an old user of psion, then went to symbian for nearly all phones and am now very happy with an E90 for my profesionnal and everyday life.
Of course the iphone is less technical and can make less things than my E90 but there is ONE thing that will shape the future of all smarphone and this is web surfing !

And after trying an ipod touch, I will happily switch from my E90 to an iphone anytime ONLY for Safari browsing and EVEN without a (pointless on E90) flash support

I give Nokia one last chance to make a new Nseries with a correct and QUICK browser until the end of this year but if the symbian browser is the same as the one reviewed by mobile review on the new nokia 5800 I will be on iPhone OS starting from next year.

I have an ipod touch and it absolutely kills S60 for browsing, photos, videos.

My N95 8Gb, however, kills in terms of productivity (documents, notes, camera, gps, file transfer, disk mode, etc).

I also use my N95 for music because I can get way more music on the N95 in eAac than i can
on even my 32 GB ipod touch. Also, I like the bluetooth AD2P on the N95 instead of a wired
headphone on the ipod touch.

So, I find that using both works best. Ipod touch for media and browsing. N95 for everything else.

For now, this is the best solution if you dont mind carrying two devices. Fact is, the ipod touch is very slim and if you combine it with an N85 it is not too much bulk at all.

I will stick with this system unless Nokia comes out with a device that is as smooth for video, photos, browsing as the ipod touch. I highly doubt it though. I found the gallery and browsing to be sub par.

Opera mini on the N95 is fast but Nokia still needs to come out with a bigger screen device
to make it desktop like browsing.

So, I will probably hang onto my N95 until next fall to see what Nokia comes out with this year (based on the Nseries touch phone rumours).

[christexaport]

bluestar, don't forget, you're comparing apples to Apple pie here. The E90 may have issues, but on a mobile broadband connection, the N95 8gb browser is the benchmark in mobile web. 90% of all videos, web based apps, and animations work exactly like a desktop. The iPhone is just a simple browser. If you like its simplicity, just install the free Opera Mini browser, which is EXACTLY like the iPhone browser, all look, not much else.

[christexaport]

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I have an ipod touch and it absolutely kills S60 for...

browsing,

As long as you keep a hands off approach. If you want to load pics and videos on MySpace using the uploader right on the page, for instance, or watch videos on most web pages right in the browser using the iPhone, forget it! The iPhone is for fun just LOOKING at the web. S60 is a productivity tool that allows you to actually USE the web. Why be surprised the iPhone browser is faster? It does less! You keep that nice iPhone hang glider, because this S60 fighter jet does me just fine.

photos...

Wonder where you get these photos? Not MMS... The iPhone is decent for VIEWING little photos. But nothing in the league of S60 devices, which excel at viewing and CREATING high resolution photos. The iPhone can't even display pictures over 3.8 megapixels last I checked! Go ahead and check. Transfer a photo from your N95 8gb with a PC since you can't do BT OBEX PUSH, and open it on the iPhone. Surprised? And if you didn't like the smaller screen, there's always TV out. No iPhone can compete with a TV screen, or an S60 device!

... and videos.

Once again, the iPhone can PLAY videos on its big screen. But most S60 devices natively can play videos just as well, WITH hardware acceleration, in more multimedia formats than any other mobile platform! And once you watch them all, you can create your own, even in near-DVD quality!

So, I find that using both works best. Ipod touch for media and browsing. N95 for everything else.

If a large screen for videos photos is all you need, I feel your pain, but there are dedicated media players like those from Archos that do better. I just think its an expensive screen, and larger, cheaper S60 screens are on the way.

For now, this is the best solution if you dont mind carrying two devices. Fact is, the ipod touch is very slim and if you combine it with an N85 it is not too much bulk at all.

N85?! Over an N95 8gb? Better read your spec sheet closer. No need to downgrade. I hope Nokia joins the bigscreen bandwagon myself. Shame you're forced to carry that pretty phone just for its screen.

I agree with everything youve said friend. Good points all.

Just to clarify, though, I dont have an iphone. I have an ipod touch (much cheaper).

As you rightly pointed out, it is best simply for viewing and not
manipulating/productivity. I agree.

The ipod touch, for example, cannot send a high res pic. N95 can
send full res.

If Nokia comes out with a big screen Nseries phone and fluid GUI I
would dump the ipod touch/N95 combo.

However, I still find S60 very unstable and slow when it comes to video and
photo playback (even with coreplayer). Resco photo viewer is snappy is though.