All About Symbian - Nokia (S60) and Sony Ericsson (UIQ) smartphones unwrapped

  #16  
Old 22-04-2003, 11:26 PM
AEFOX AEFOX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 610
AEFOX is on a distinguished road
hi!

HI!...

HEHE!..

ok .. many people go and buy new monitors.. lol!

because yes!.. it's obvius!

You can easy see the grainess and sharper on the HQ and the
softness, less saturated and blurry on the Low Q...

so!... if nobody see that is obvius difference of image quality ...

then i don't know what it is

see this test image that i attached and you tell me ... you notice?

if you notice this .. then you can see the same errors on the pictures that
nk8 is comparing above ... are tipical JPG compression artifacts.

cya! 8)
__________________
Alejandro (AEFOX)
7650 (1 year)
6600 (6 months)
7610 (6 months)
6630 (6 months)
6680 (4 months)
N70 (6 months)
N80 (right now) and very happry user

  #17  
Old 22-04-2003, 11:28 PM
AEFOX AEFOX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 610
AEFOX is on a distinguished road
you see?

more...
__________________
Alejandro (AEFOX)
7650 (1 year)
6600 (6 months)
7610 (6 months)
6630 (6 months)
6680 (4 months)
N70 (6 months)
N80 (right now) and very happry user

  #18  
Old 22-04-2003, 11:32 PM
AEFOX AEFOX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 610
AEFOX is on a distinguished road
hi

see on the pictures compared by nk8 his bag with yellow numbers label "2000" on both pics...

and the green boc with white text "Motherboard" ... on both pics..

there you can easy notice the difference...

and the grainess on the closset doors...

well...

cya!
__________________
Alejandro (AEFOX)
7650 (1 year)
6600 (6 months)
7610 (6 months)
6630 (6 months)
6680 (4 months)
N70 (6 months)
N80 (right now) and very happry user

  #19  
Old 23-04-2003, 12:13 AM
deathmonger's Avatar
deathmonger deathmonger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Spain
Posts: 574
deathmonger is on a distinguished road
my2c

NOW IS OBVIOUS
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DeathMOnger (deathmongers@gmail.com)
Mobile History: 3310 > 8310 > 7210 > 7650 > 6600 > 6260 > N90 > N80 > N93 > N95 > N96 | 5800 XpressMusic > N97 | 7500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  #20  
Old 23-04-2003, 02:44 AM
MaleBuffy MaleBuffy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,375
MaleBuffy is on a distinguished road
Ehhh....no it isnt!

Well there is a difference in the pics you posted BUT this is by no means the same as in the first two pictures by nk8. As for the monitor...is 21inch 1280x960 and a 1024x768 17inch monitor enough for you? We are sure that there is a difference on those two pics but it isnt obvious like in your pictures.
__________________
My brother went to Iraq and all I got was a lausy T-shirt saying......"Oops...there are no weapons of mass destruction".

malebuffy@allaboutsymbian.com

http://www.symbiandiaries.com/malebuffy
http://www.symbianopensource.com

  #21  
Old 23-04-2003, 04:42 AM
cj99 cj99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 99
cj99 is on a distinguished road
Hey Dude,
All you need is Photographer 2.0 See the image quality that I get with 'excellent' quality setting. Its almost unbelievabe for that phone!!!!

CJ

  #22  
Old 23-04-2003, 07:39 AM
Seremify Seremify is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 537
Seremify is on a distinguished road
Where was that last photo taken?
__________________
Currently using E51 and E71

3810 > 6110 > 6210 > T20 > 8310 > 3650 > 6100 > 7250i > 9210 > 7610 > D600 > w800i > Z140 > N73 > N93 > E65 > E51 > E71

  #23  
Old 23-04-2003, 08:45 AM
deathmonger's Avatar
deathmonger deathmonger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Spain
Posts: 574
deathmonger is on a distinguished road
my2c

Quote:
Originally Posted by cj99
Hey Dude,
All you need is Photographer 2.0 See the image quality that I get with 'excellent' quality setting. Its almost unbelievabe for that phone!!!!

CJ
I think I'll get Photographer 2.0 and see the difference, that photo you posted seems pretty good.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DeathMOnger (deathmongers@gmail.com)
Mobile History: 3310 > 8310 > 7210 > 7650 > 6600 > 6260 > N90 > N80 > N93 > N95 > N96 | 5800 XpressMusic > N97 | 7500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  #24  
Old 23-04-2003, 08:49 AM
cj99 cj99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 99
cj99 is on a distinguished road
Another reason why some photos might be appearing bad is the color setting on monitors. What is the color depth set in your monitor? Mine is set to 32 bit.

  #25  
Old 23-04-2003, 01:48 PM
nk8 nk8 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,085
nk8 is on a distinguished road
@fox mulder, i can definately notice differences with your attached pictures, i know the photos i included are different, it's just hard to explain but there is so little difference between them, i just need a bigger vocabulary in order to describe the differences
__________________
NK

www.haroboy.boltblue.com

  #26  
Old 23-04-2003, 02:57 PM
AEFOX AEFOX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 610
AEFOX is on a distinguished road
hi!

BTW!..

i use 21" monitor at 1280 x 1024 at 32 bits color (85hz. Refresh rate)
with GForce 4 Ti4600 ... (some times i use 1600 x 1200 or 2048 x 1536 depending on the size of the images that i am working with)

The video chip set is as important as the monitor to get a good image quality on your monitor, you can buy a huge expensive monitor but you can see crap blury shit if you don't have a good quality video chip set (Good Video Card).

I am working on Computer Graphics since 1985 (yep! watching monitors), may be that's why it's easy for me to notice the difference... sorry if nobody see this obvius difference.

Anyway... i leave this topic, it's abdurd to disscus something like this here, this is not a PC forum...

cya! 8)
__________________
Alejandro (AEFOX)
7650 (1 year)
6600 (6 months)
7610 (6 months)
6630 (6 months)
6680 (4 months)
N70 (6 months)
N80 (right now) and very happry user

  #27  
Old 23-04-2003, 06:57 PM
deathmonger's Avatar
deathmonger deathmonger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Spain
Posts: 574
deathmonger is on a distinguished road
my2c

Come on, the difference is obvious only in those last b&w images. No matter what MONITOR or GRAPHIC CARD you've got, all support 32bits and high resolutions. The diffence is almost none _IN THIS SPECIAL CASE_

HIGH QUALITY settings work only under certain circumstances, well, in this case the diff betwen HIGH and LOW is very little.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DeathMOnger (deathmongers@gmail.com)
Mobile History: 3310 > 8310 > 7210 > 7650 > 6600 > 6260 > N90 > N80 > N93 > N95 > N96 | 5800 XpressMusic > N97 | 7500
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ads

  #28  
Old 23-04-2003, 07:10 PM
David86 David86 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 32
David86 is on a distinguished road
Well it took me awhile too see but there is a small difference, i see more blur in the picture taken with normal quality, and like Aefox said its normal when saving JPEG files in less quality...

Nvidia isnt so famed cause of the picture quality, its avarage but like ATi got better. And the most important thing in the monitor is what kind of "tubes" are used (like Trinitron... I use a 19" Sony Trinitron monitor with Geforce3 ).

  #29  
Old 23-04-2003, 08:53 PM
MemphisX's Avatar
MemphisX MemphisX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Thessaloniki/Greece
Posts: 1,089
MemphisX is on a distinguished road
Re: hi!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AEFOX
BTW!..

i use 21" monitor at 1280 x 1024 at 32 bits color (85hz. Refresh rate)
with GForce 4 Ti4600 ... (some times i use 1600 x 1200 or 2048 x 1536 depending on the size of the images that i am working with)

The video chip set is as important as the monitor to get a good image quality on your monitor, you can buy a huge expensive monitor but you can see crap blury shit if you don't have a good quality video chip set (Good Video Card).

I am working on Computer Graphics since 1985 (yep! watching monitors), may be that's why it's easy for me to notice the difference... sorry if nobody see this obvius difference.

Anyway... i leave this topic, it's abdurd to disscus something like this here, this is not a PC forum...

cya! 8)

No the video card is not so much a problem nowadays. Even with my old S3 ViRGE The quality was the same to my eyes. On new Video cards depends on the gamma you have set. And even if it was a problem then Matrox has the best quality(but you need special tools to measure the quality)...

The monitor on the other side can be also too little of importance. I use a very old and cheap 14' monitor (Likom if you know the company). And I can see the difference (with a Geforce 2 MX400 video card). But if you have an LCD monitor, then yes you will hardly see the difference (not to mention that the majority of LCD monitors can only support up to 18bit compared to 24bit color of the photos). The difference is too little to notice. After all if you want better pictures then buy a digital camera...
__________________
SX1, Symbian News and many more :



Not everyone is meant to make a difference.
But for me the choice to live an ordinary life is no longer an option.

If there was no GOD it would be neccessary to invent him.

  #30  
Old 24-04-2003, 01:50 PM
AEFOX AEFOX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 610
AEFOX is on a distinguished road
ok

ok..

letīs the game begin!

Anybody please post a couple of new pictures, take one with low quality and same target with normal quality, donīt tell us what is the hi or low one.

just put them numbers 1 and 2 to be named later...

i will guess again...

thanks! 8)
__________________
Alejandro (AEFOX)
7650 (1 year)
6600 (6 months)
7610 (6 months)
6630 (6 months)
6680 (4 months)
N70 (6 months)
N80 (right now) and very happry user
 

Bookmarks

Tags
difference, spot

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 AM.


vBulletin skins developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Notes || Contact Us || Privacy Policy