Patabata
27-04-2009, 11:32 PM
CPU Count Single CPU
CPU Type ARM 11
CPU Clock Rate 434 MHz
http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/N97
CPU Type ARM 11
CPU Clock Rate 434 MHz
http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/N97
|
View Full Version : Nokia N97. CPU-speed = 434 Mhz, singel core :( Patabata 27-04-2009, 11:32 PM CPU Count Single CPU CPU Type ARM 11 CPU Clock Rate 434 MHz http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/N97 Patabata 27-04-2009, 11:57 PM edit: topic should look like this: Nokia N97. CPU-speed = 434 Mhz, single ""CPU"" :( Taomyn 28-04-2009, 10:04 AM Yes, just read a similar report on Symbian Freak. At a time when the competitive products from the corresponding category and price tag are able to offer at least twice better processor with a dedicated GPU, the Nokia’s choice of a humble and outdated single ARM processor design and the insufficient 128 MB of RAM looks like a serious miscalculation if you ask me and I must say that I am very, very disappointed with Nokia's hardware choice. (http://www.symbian-freak.com/news/009/04/dream_is_over_n97_processor_details_revealed.htm) Please tell me this isn't true or that it won't be a problem, though I suspect it will. What are Nokia thinking :con? bchliu 28-04-2009, 11:40 AM I am very disappointed at this.. But doesnt make sense in comparison to the FCC pictures however - ARM 11, 434 Mhz? Theres no news on the web as to this specific type of processor at all. The weirder thing is - when I went to the TI site to check out their offerings: http://focus.ti.com/paramsearch/docs/parametricsearch.tsp?&familyId=44&uiTemplateId=PP-TP&techFamId=null§ionId=2&tabId=25&appId=null&viewDeviceCallingPage=null&totalCount=159&showAdditionalParameters=no¶meter=2437704398&lc=3000897&lc=2000887&lc=2001216&lc=2000062&lc=2001224&lc=2001253&lc=2000702&lc=2001215&lc=2000059&lc=2000568&lc=2000603&lc=2000885&lc=2000607&lc=2000980&lc=2001218&lc=2001202&compare=yes&download=yes&sort=yes&customize=yes¶mResults=yes¶mCriteria=yes&familyTree=yes&military=no&baSystem=yes¶mTable=no&sortOption=PA_SUB_FAMILY_NAME&sortMode=DESC&searchPaths=1000044&pageId=undefined&templateId=0&navigationId=0&family=dsp¶mTable=no&military=no&&uiTemplateId=PP-TP&techFamId=null§ionId=2&tabId=25&appId=null&viewDeviceCallingPage=null&resetCompare=true#sdp Comes up with two different frequencies - 600 Mhz "Risc" frequency and a 430 Mhz "Frequency". Could there be some mix up somewhere along the line in this information? Regardless though - Huge disappointment. Unfortunately as I have said many times - hardware and software work hand in hand. No matter how good the hardware is, if there is no software support, then it might as well not be there in the first place. Unless we get some real support through major vendors such as Nokia (through their software), then having super hardware will not mean anything (other than to show off that your phone can do billions of polygons a second or something). Think I've settled in on the Omnia HD.. goodbye Nokia.. Dr Tran 01-05-2009, 02:09 AM The reaction from symbian frak reminds me of South Park robble robble robble |