SwitchBlade
02-01-2005, 02:15 PM
Looking at smartphones and PDAs I'm increasingly pondering that the old fashioned home computer ideas of static hardware and an OS dedicated to it are a damn good idea. As it stands the x86 based PC is a ludicrously customisable unit with the ability to pick and change hardware for many aspects of the unit and a selection of generic OSs to run on all this hardware.
Many moons ago the hardware didn't change apart from if you were lucky a solitary expansion port on your computer to add extra functionality. The OS was customised to the hardware it was running and resulted in a stable and sometimes tweakable system (looking back at the old 16 bit Atari and Amiga computers here). In a time where machines are getting faster and many functions gain their own dedicated chips to do the work for them the need for an OS to be an umbrella to grab all the functionality results in machines seemingly running slower than before. On the opposite side consoles which feature fixed hardware in order to shift games, and smartphones/PDAs featuring similarly fixed hardware are able to run with many improvements over the generation before.
At the moment a computers are still mostly big beige boxes with loads of hardware in, surely it would be sensible for manufacturers to produce much much smaller and unobtrusive machines, as an average user wouldn't want all the crap and only needs a static box which they will no doubt replace 5 years or so down the line. Hell as a "power user" I've little need for the modular design having been using a laptop for the last 3-4 years as my main computer. Lets face it in a similar boat a "power gamer" will buy a console and keep the same unit for 2-3 years before that needs replacing, does the average home PC really need the hardware modularity we have when a more compact custom unit could do the job equally well and with a sensibly thought out OS, do it faster and more stable?
Many moons ago the hardware didn't change apart from if you were lucky a solitary expansion port on your computer to add extra functionality. The OS was customised to the hardware it was running and resulted in a stable and sometimes tweakable system (looking back at the old 16 bit Atari and Amiga computers here). In a time where machines are getting faster and many functions gain their own dedicated chips to do the work for them the need for an OS to be an umbrella to grab all the functionality results in machines seemingly running slower than before. On the opposite side consoles which feature fixed hardware in order to shift games, and smartphones/PDAs featuring similarly fixed hardware are able to run with many improvements over the generation before.
At the moment a computers are still mostly big beige boxes with loads of hardware in, surely it would be sensible for manufacturers to produce much much smaller and unobtrusive machines, as an average user wouldn't want all the crap and only needs a static box which they will no doubt replace 5 years or so down the line. Hell as a "power user" I've little need for the modular design having been using a laptop for the last 3-4 years as my main computer. Lets face it in a similar boat a "power gamer" will buy a console and keep the same unit for 2-3 years before that needs replacing, does the average home PC really need the hardware modularity we have when a more compact custom unit could do the job equally well and with a sensibly thought out OS, do it faster and more stable?